Abstract:Background. The effectiveness of oral corrective feedback (OCF) in language learning is influenced by learners' comprehension and response to various OCF techniques. Therefore, it is essential for teachers to consider learners' preferences for OCF strategies. Purpose. This quantitative study aimed to investigate the preferences of Thai as a foreign language (TFL) learners for ten commonly discussed types of OCF. Specifically, it examined whether these preferences are influenced by four learner variables: proficiency level, first language (L1), foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA), and foreign language enjoyment (FLE). Methods. The study involved 288 university students from Chinese, Japanese, and Korean TFL settings, and the data from questionnaires were analysed using appropriate statistical methods. Results. The findings indicate that, regardless of proficiency level, L1, FLCA, or FLE level, learners prefer more explicit OCF techniques, such as metalinguistics feedback and explicit correction. However, Korean undergraduates scored lower in the majority of OCF strategies (i.e., ignoring, elicitation, recast, explanation, and public feedback) compared to the other participants. The MANOVA analysis revealed significant differences in ignore, peer correction, recast, and private feedback based on proficiency level and L1 background. Although the differences between the FLE and FLCA approaches were not statistically significant, high FLE and FLCA groups tended to prefer more OCF strategies than the low groups. Conclusion. This study has significant implications for instructional practices in TFL settings and for L2 lecturers in the classroom. By understanding learners' preferences for OCF, educators can tailor their instructional approaches to meet the specific needs of their students.

Investigating Students Attitudes on Oral Corrective Feedback: Small-scale Survey in Academic Speaking Class

EXAMINING STUDENTS’ ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK PREFERENCES FOR IMPROVING SPEAKING PROFICIENCY

Teacher practices and student preferences of oral corrective feedback in Indonesian EFL classrooms: A Vygotskian perspective

INVESTIGATING THE USE OF EFL TEACHERS’ ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN SPEAKING CLASSES

Oral Corrective Feedback in the Perception of Islamic Junior High School English Teachers and Students

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARDS ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN A SPEAKING CLASS

Male and Female Students’ Preferences on the Oral Corrective Feedback in English as Foreign Language (EFL) Speaking Classroom

Oral Corrective Feedback and Error Analysis: Indonesian Teachers’ Beliefs to Improve Speaking Skill

Oral corrective feedback as a formative assessment in teaching speaking skill

EXPLORING IMPLICIT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK PREFERENCES ON STUDENTS’ SPEAKING PERFORMANCE

Students Attitudes Towards Oral Corrective Feedback: A Case Study from Oman

The Effectiveness of Positive Feedback in Teaching Speaking Skill

HOW ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IS PERCEIVED BY EFL BILINGUAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHER

The Urgency of Oral Corrective Feedback in English Language Teaching: Students and Teachers’ Perception

High-School Students’ Beliefs about Oral Corrective Feedback in EFL Classroom: A Survey Study

EFL Students' Perceptions towards Lecturer's Corrective Feedback in Speaking Class

The Distribution of Junior High School Students’ Language Awareness Across English Oral Proficiency and Oral Corrective Feedback Preference

Students’ Preferences Regarding the Techniques of Oral Corrective Feedback in a Tertiary Institution

Indonesian EFL Students' attitude toward Oral Presentations

Teachers’ Perceptions of Oral Corrective Feedback in Form-focused Language Classrooms: Why do they Correct the Way they do?

Preferences for Oral Corrective Feedback: Are Language Proficiency, First Language, Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety, and Enjoyment Involved?