Abstract:Corrective feedback with its potential role in oral interaction, and teacher’s questions with the capacity to engage the learners in conversational activities led to the investigation of their roles in speaking accuracy of EFL learners. Teacher’s display and referential questions were employed along with explicit (explicit correction, metalinguistic clue, elicitation) and implicit (conversational recast, repetition, clarification request) corrective feedback to create opportunities for the learners to participate in interaction, to modify their errors, and to produce accurate output. Therefore,112 learners who attended 10 intact classes of 15 session terms in one control and four experimental groups were homogenized through administering a PET. In all groups, accuracy was focused while learners were engaged in conversational activities. In the first and second experimental groups teacher’s display questions were implemented followed by the provision of explicit and implicit feedback types. However, the third and fourth experimental groups were asked to answer teacher’s referential questions who received explicit and implicit corrective feedback respectively. To measure the learners’ speaking accuracy, both pre and posttests of speaking were recorded and transcribed to estimate the percentage of error free clause. An analysis of covariance indicated that in learners’ speaking accuracy; both teacher’s display and referential questions with either explicit or implicit feedback types were significantly effective; there were no significant differences between the effectiveness of teacher’s display and referential questions with explicit corrective feedback; and teacher’s referential questions were significantly more effective than display questions with implicit feedback types. The substantial enhancement of EFL learners’ speaking accuracy bears testimony that in interactional view, communicative behavior resulting from the questioning and corrective feedback paves the way for a higher level of accurate output.

TEACHING SPEAKING: EXPLORING METHOD OF TEACHING AND ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN EFL LEARNERS’ CLASSROOM

Oral Corrective Feedback and Error Analysis: Indonesian Teachers’ Beliefs to Improve Speaking Skill

INVESTIGATING THE USE OF EFL TEACHERS’ ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN SPEAKING CLASSES

The Effectiveness of Positive Feedback in Teaching Speaking Skill

Oral corrective feedback as a formative assessment in teaching speaking skill

HOW ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IS PERCEIVED BY EFL BILINGUAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHER

THE LEVEL OF TEACHER'S FEEDBACK IN ENGLISH TEACHING: AN EFL CLASSROOM DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

Learners' Perceptions on the Use of Oral Corrective Feedback in One-to-One EFL Classroom

EFL Students’ Responses on Oral Corrective Feedbacks and Uptakes in SpeakingClass

Analysing teacher’s feedback used by an English teacher of EFL in senior high school

Oral corrective feedback: Pre-service English as a second language teachers’ beliefs and practices

Effect of Teachers’ Corrective Feedback on Learners’ Oral Accuracy in English Speaking Lessons

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARDS ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN A SPEAKING CLASS

Navigating Teacher’s Display and Referential Questions to Enhance Learners’ Speaking Accuracy: A Case of Explicit and Implicit Corrective Feedback

Teachers’ Perceptions of Oral Corrective Feedback in Form-focused Language Classrooms: Why do they Correct the Way they do?

Corrective Feedbacks and Their Impacts To Learners’ Uptakes In EFL Speaking Class

Conventional Teaching and an Interactive-Based Teaching Methods to adjust Learners’ Grammar and Speaking Competence in English Classrooms: A Comparative Study for effectiveness methods in learning

Involving native speakers in oral corrective focused grammar feedback while conversing: an activity theory perspective

Ethiopian EFL teachers’ classroom practice and learners’ view on teaching and learning English speaking skill

Investigating Students Attitudes on Oral Corrective Feedback: Small-scale Survey in Academic Speaking Class

Oral corrective feedback in language teaching: A historical perspective