Abstract:Abstract Many studies about eTandem and language learning stem from learners in Western institutions of higher education. Unfortunately, there is a lack of research investigating the telecollaboration regarding language development between learners in the East and the West. Against this backdrop, a small-scale, six-week Chinese-English eTandem project focusing on learners’ language learning processes and experiences was undertaken between nine Chinese university students learning English in China and nine British university students learning Chinese in the UK. Multiple datasets were collected from learners’ diaries, synchronous Skype communication recordings, email exchanges, interviews and a post-project survey. This paper reports the main language error types made by Chinese L2 learners of English and error correction strategies provided by eTandem partners of competent L1 English speakers, along with how Chinese participants responded to the corrections. A thorough analysis of the research data indicated three types of linguistic errors in written tasks made by Chinese L2 learners of English: grammatical, lexical and idiomatic expressions. Another finding was that, although explicit written correction was the most commonly used strategy in email exchanges, learners preferred explanations with examples. In addition to previously established gains of eTandem learning, such as authentic communication, forging friendship and promoting intercultural awareness, positive responses to competent L1 partners’ error corrections was another major benefit indicated in our data. Our study pinpoints the importance of both pre-project training of participants on error-correction strategies with examples and how to respond to partner feedback in future eTandem projects.

Involving native speakers in oral corrective focused grammar feedback while conversing: an activity theory perspective

EFL Learners’ Corrective Feedback Decision-Making in Task-Based Peer Interaction

Oral Corrective Feedback on L2 Writing from a Sociocultural Perspective

Corrective Feedback via Instant Messenger Learning Activities in NS-NNS and NNS-NNS Dyads

Efficacy of an ICALL tutoring system and process-oriented corrective feedback

What Type of Oral Corrective Feedback do Chilean EFL Young Learners Prefer?

TEACHING SPEAKING: EXPLORING METHOD OF TEACHING AND ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN EFL LEARNERS’ CLASSROOM

Triadic Oral Peer Feedback: Does EFL Learners’ L2 Proficiency Pairing Play a Role?

The Implementation of Effective Online Asynchronous Corrective Feedback on the Oral Production of English as a Foreign Language Learners in University Virtual Speaking Classes

Peer versus teacher corrections through electronic learning communities and face-to-face classroom interactions and EFL learners' passion for learning, speaking fluency, and accuracy

Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study

Effect of Teachers’ Corrective Feedback on Learners’ Oral Accuracy in English Speaking Lessons

Realizing Corrective Feedback in Task-Based Chatbots Engineered for Second Language Learning

Learners' Oral Corrective Feedback Preferences in Relation to Their Cultural Background, Proficiency Level and Types of Error

Understanding the learning process of peer feedback activity: An ethnographic study of Exploratory Practice

The Affordances of Language Choice in Negotiation of Oral Peer Feedback on L2 Writing

Oral corrective feedback: Pre-service English as a second language teachers’ beliefs and practices

Feedback, Response, and Learner Development: A Sociocultural Approach to Corrective Feedback in Second Language Writing

Exploring language learning and corrective feedback in an eTandem project

Teacher-Student Collaborative Assessment and Content-Based Instruction: A Case Study of English Writing at a Chinese University

Oral corrective feedback in language teaching: A historical perspective