Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

Internal Rebellions and External Threats: A Model of Government Organizational Forms in Ancient China

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

Structure Hypothesis of Authoritarian Rule: Evidence from the Lifespans of China's Dynasties

The Vertically Decentralized Authoritarianism and the Mechanisms of Political Stability in China

Centralization and Decentralization of Power Structure:A Theory of Ruling Risks and Empirical Evidence from Chinese History

Political Risk of Centralization and the Vertical Separation of Powers:Reform of Contemporary Social Management System from a Historical Perspective

Constructed Hierarchical Government Trust in China: Formation Mechanism and Political Effects

Toward a Theory of Internal Governance Structure of China’s Large SOEs

Loyalty versus Competence : Internal Conflicts and the Pattern of Bureaucratic Control in China , 1644-1911

The Decision-Making Process of the Chinese Government at the County Level

China’s Governance Model and System in Transition

The "Necessary and Dangerous" Power: Administrative Prerogative in Constitutional Controversies of the Early Republic of China

Unbalanced Model: An Interpretation of the Internal Governance of Chinese Universities

All the Emperor ’ s Men ? Internal Conflicts and Bureaucratic Selection in Late Imperial China

The Governance Theory and Reconstruction of Chinese Government's Functions

Understanding China'S Administrative Adaptation: The Role Of Weak Organizations

Reformation Strategies of Power Restriction and Supervision Mechanism in China

Capitalists, Taxation, and Authoritarian Durability: Reexamine the Infrastructural State Power Mechanisms in China

Information Structure and Organization Performance: Evidence from the Imperial Bureaucracy of China

General Analysis of Rural Governance

A response to Francis Fukuyama’s ‘reflections on Chinese governance’