Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

The Governance Theory and Reconstruction of Chinese Government's Functions

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

New Agenda for the Study of Chinese Governance

Harmonious Rural Society:Governance Status and Model Reconstruction:China Rural Society Governance from the Perspective of Governance Theory

Double Building of the Government and Society:The Practical Proposition of Public Governance

Study On Transformation Of Government Functions In The Development Of China'S Land Market

Social Co-Governance A Solution Originated From The Legitimacy Demands Of Multiple Parties

China’s “New Normal”: from Social Control to Social Governance

Public Governance Improvement under “Holistic Government” in the Transitional Period of China

Collaborative Governance in Contemporary Chinese Social Development——An Analysis Framework

The Chinese Logic of Consultative Governance

INTRODUCTION: EXPLORING URBAN GOVERNANCE IN CONTEMPORARY CHINA

A Study on the Role of Government in Governance of Social Conflicts during the Transition Period in China

Structural Transformation and Governance Mechanism on Urban Community Governance

Making the Social Work: Toward a Functionalist View of Social Governance

Cooperative Governance:New Trends of Public Affairs Management

Create governance:Nongovernmental organizations and Public service-oriented government

Urban Community Governance: Confusion and Thinking

The Reform of the Government: Responsibility, Capacity and Effects

Analysis of the Requirements of Modernization of China's Social Governance System

Governance and public administration in China