Abstract:Summary Landscape planning lacked an evidence-based method for the reflection of planning models on the imaginary level in order to present the image content and the relationships in the image as the basis for interpretation in a verifiable manner. The contribution is based on the thesis that the perceptual analysis according to Rudolf Arnheim can be translated into landscape planning. The case study, here an illustration with two plan sketches for urban and landscape development, is described and interpreted with the Gestalt theoretical perceptual analysis according to the criteria theme, theses, principle sketches and composition lines, interpretation, conclusion and Gestalt theoretical results. The analysed planning sketches have a low “reality level” and are part of the imaginary level. The theory of science contained therein can be understood by Gestalt theory as elementary theory of design. In the sketches, the living spaces and economic areas of the city are divided into the elements ‘settlement’ and ‘landscape’ and thereby undergo a revaluation of their significance. The replacement of figure (city) and ground (landscape) can be interpreted in terms of gestalt theory as a change of theme in the sketches as the greatest possible structural exchange. The results of the analysis are processed as research theses in the contextualisation of landscape planning and thus examined scientifically on the basis of circumstantial evidence against the reality of the living environments of the urban dwellers. The contribution proves that the perceptual analysis according to R. Arnheim is a suitable method in landscape planning for describing and interpreting graphic representations of planning models. Interdisciplinary cooperation is a contribution to the holistic treatment of a topic, because structuralist landscape planning has structural similarities with Gestalt theory and is committed to the dialogical principle. As a theory of organisation (development), Gestalt theory derives principles, structures, their relationships and qualities and is therefore suitable as a meta-theory of landscape planning to characterise the values and ethical bases in planning. This applies to all areas of the field of consciousness in landscape planning.

Landscape Architecture and Landscape Planning: Friends or Foes?

Conversations between Nature and Landscape:Evolution and Experience of Modern Netherlands Landscape Architecture

Cultural Encounters of Landscape Architects Xiaoxiang Sun and Lawrence Halprin

Composing the Landscape: Analyzing Landscape Architecture as Design Formation

Characteristics of Modern Landscape Architecture and Its Planning Methods

Disciplinary convergence: landscape architecture and the spatial design disciplines

Toward a New Landscape

Landscape Planning in New Zealand

Greenbelt and Green Heart: separating and integrating landscapes in European city regions

Designing stepping-stones landscapes: a 2D perspective does not lead to more standardization than an in-situ perspective

Perceptual Analysis according to Rudolf Arnheim’s Gestalt Theoretical approach in Structuralist Landscape Planning

Landscape ecological concepts in planning: review of recent developments

Landscape Architecture in Terms of the Wholeness of Land

A solution to the conflicts of multiple planning boundaries: Landscape functional zoning in a resource-based city in China

Planning Ideals of Olmsted--Beyond Park Design and Landscape Design

New strategies in the fusion of architecture and landscape

Decentring landscape: rethinking landscape analysis with a relational ontology

BRIDGING THE GAPS BETWEEN LANDSCAPE DESIGN PRACTICE AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH: A GRAPHICAL INTERPRETATION

Landscape Ecological Concepts in Planning (LEP): Progress, Hotspots, and Prospects

Beyond the Organic Intellectual: Politics and Contestation in the Planning Practice

Boundary thinking in landscape architecture and boundary-spanning roles of landscape architects