Abstract:Abstract With the universal architecture for peace and security centred upon the UN Charter of 1945 and the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) of 1968 being built on great power foundations, there are manifest problems when there is no consensus amongst those great powers in the face of existential threats to peace and security. The question considered in this article is whether the European Security Architecture (ESA), consisting of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the European Union (EU), can forge a different and distinct path that can provide security for States and individuals while remaining within the international rule of law. In contrast to the executive-dominated universal collective security system, power and authority in the ESA are much more diffuse, fluid and overlapping, with a mixture of foundational documents ranging from the constitutional/supranational (the EU), contractual (NATO) and political (the OSCE), as well as a range of overlapping competences, powers and practice in: peaceful settlement; the promotion of human rights and democracy; the enforcement of fundamental rules of international law by non-forcible measures; collective defence commitments; crisis management; and nuclear deterrence. The ESA, though less constitutional in a hierarchical sense when compared to the UN/NPT system, promises greater connection between security and law, but is it capable of deterring and confronting naked aggression and other egregious violations of international law?

The Common Security and Defence Policy as an act of American hegemony

Common Foreign and Security Policy: A Comparative Analysis of the Attitudes of Powers

Towards German leadership? Germany’s Evolving Role and the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy

Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?

Failing forward in the EU's common security and defense policy: the integration of EU crisis management

Germany's relations with the United States and China from a strategic triangle perspective

Persevering with bandwagoning, not hedging: why European security cooperation still conforms to realism

The Stille Allianz Revisited

Exploring the dynamics of policy change in EU security and defence: policy entrepreneurs behind the Strategic Compass

Power, Institutions and the CSDP: The Promise of Institutionalist Theory

The US–EU partnership: more necessary than ever

European foreign policy since the Cold War: How ambitious, how inhibited?

Toward a theory of EU foreign policy-making: multi-level governance, domestic politics, and national adaptation to Europe's common foreign and security policy

The Position of the European Security Architecture within the International Legal Order

Balancing Against or Balancing With? The Spectrum of Alignment and the Endurance of American Hegemony

The myth of German hegemony in the euro area revisited

Unified in response to rising powers? China, Russia and EU-US relations

The evolution of the common foreign and security policy of the European Union

Beyond Intergovernmental Cooperation: The Influence of the European Parliament and the Commission on EU Foreign and Security Policies

Ein regulatorischer Sicherheitsstaat? Herrschaftsgrundlagen und Instrumente europäischer Sicherheitspolitik

American Hegemony and European Independent Defense: Critique on the Balancing Theory Explanation