Abstract:Faced with the emergence of strategic partnerships (SP), international actors have approached this new phenomenon in the international system through different logics of action. Such logics are tightly associated with the purposes that the SPs are intended to fulfill for the initiating actor. They also tend to reflect the worldview of the initiators as well as their perceptions of the major organizing principles of the international system. In this article, we investigate three different logics: the conventional, the relational, and the functional. These three logics correspond to the strategies of strategic partnering of the United States (US), China, and the European Union (EU) and reflect both the dominant foreign policy orientation of these actors and their self-perceptions as major poles of power in the world. We analyze the construction of these logics by focusing on the relative importance that each of them accords to interests and values when setting up SPs around the world. We contend that an important conceptual gap exists between the major initiators of strategic partnerships, the US and China, which are both to a large extent driven by a self-perception as Great Powers, although the logics with which they seek to fulfill this role diverge substantially. The EU pursues SPs according to a functional logic which in itself also diverge in significant aspects to both the US and China. Taken together, the interests which dictate the necessity of strategic partnerships and the values which condition their feasibility form four distinct patterns of partnering: the homogenous, marriage-of-convenience, come-in-handy, and heterogeneous SPs. These ideal forms of SPs have distinct but contrasting implications for the structure of the international system.

Exploring the dynamics of policy change in EU security and defence: policy entrepreneurs behind the Strategic Compass

Supranational entrepreneurs: the High Representative and the EU global strategy

The evolution of the common foreign and security policy of the European Union

Toward a theory of EU foreign policy-making: multi-level governance, domestic politics, and national adaptation to Europe's common foreign and security policy

German Foreign Policy, the Ukraine Crisis and the Euro-Atlantic Order: Assessing the Dynamics of Change

European foreign policy since the Cold War: How ambitious, how inhibited?

The Role of Strategic Autonomy in the EU Green Transition

Common Foreign and Security Policy: A Comparative Analysis of the Attitudes of Powers

A Policy Compass for Ecological Economics

Towards German leadership? Germany’s Evolving Role and the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy

Drivers and Impact of European Defence Market Integration: A Literature Meta-Synthesis with Economic Focus

Role Dynamics in a Structured Relationship: the EU–China Strategic Partnership

Comment on Andrew Moravcsik, "A New Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs and International Cooperation''

GEOPOLITICAL TURN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION: THE CONCEPTUAL REVOLUTION OR CONTINUATION OF THE TRADITION?

Contending logics of strategic partnership in international politics

The Common Security and Defence Policy as an act of American hegemony

Influence beyond formal powers: The parliamentarisation of European Union security policy

EUROPEAN UNITY AND SOLIDARITY IN THE FACE OF THREATS POSED BY RUSSIA'S MILITARY POLICY

Ein regulatorischer Sicherheitsstaat? Herrschaftsgrundlagen und Instrumente europäischer Sicherheitspolitik

Navigating the Legacy of Westphalia: The European Union’s Role in Managing Russian-Ukrainian Relations

Die Europäische Politische Gemeinschaft: multilaterale Koordination und differenzierte Integration in „Wider Europe“