Nature of the Government in the Perspective of New Institutional Economics
Wu Jinqun,Geng Yina
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2008.02.007
2008-01-01
Abstract:There are many similar institutional characteristics between government and firm. We try to review the nature of the government, which can be seen as a super-firm in the perspective of institutional economics, especially in the modern corporate theory. Government is a result of rational selection of mankind. In this procession, a series of tangible or intangible contracts were signed or an institutional network was formed. In this institutional network, there is a political principal-agent relationship between the people and the government. The principal-agent chain can be described as people—lawmakers and politicians—administrative bureaucrats. In contrast with the economic principal-agent relationship, political principal-agent relationship is more complex. First, the practical principal-agent chain may not be very clear. Second, the government has plenty of goals, which will confront with each other. Third, incentive for political agents will not be much enough because of the phenomenon of multitask or multi-principal agency. Fourth, there are more adverse selections and moral hazards in political principal-agent relationship than in economic principal-agent relationship. Fifth, political contracts are more incomplete than economic contracts, because the uncertainty of politics is stronger. Sixth, there is little exit mechanism for political principles. Meanwhile, there is little effective competition mechanism among political agents. Therefore, political principal-agent problems are more serious than economic principal-agent problems. In order to solve political principal-agent problems, people need a complete set of institutions to coordinate the relationship of people, lawmakers, politicians, and administrative bureaucrats. These institutions, such as referendum, agent selection, contract design, power balance, supervision, and ideological restriction, can be named governmental governance structure. However, the governmental governance structure can not solve political principal-agent problems completely. People will have to select a rational scale and scope of the government. Generally speaking, people hope to keep the optimal scale of the government. But this optimal scale is bigger than the scale that lawmakers and politicians hope for, and smaller than the scale that administrative bureaucrats hope for. In fact, the scale of the government in one country or district is decided by public choices. Namely, the game equilibrium of people, lawmakers, politicians, and administrative bureaucrats will decide the scale of the government. For the optimal scope of the government, it will be affected by the transaction cost within and among governments, economies of scale and scope.