Abstract:Abstract Since the 1970s, scientists have developed statistical methods intended to formalize detection of changes in global climate and to attribute such changes to relevant causal factors, natural and anthropogenic. Detection and attribution (D&A) of climate change trends is commonly performed using a variant of Hasselmann’s “optimal fingerprinting” method, which involves a linear regression of historical climate observations on corresponding output from numerical climate models. However, it has long been known in the field of time series analysis that regressions of “non-stationary” or “trending” variables are, in general, statistically inconsistent and often spurious. When non-stationarity is caused by “integrated” processes, as is likely the case for climate variables, consistency of least-squares estimators depends on “cointegration” of regressors. This study has shown, using an idealized linear-response-model framework, that if standard assumptions hold then the optimal fingerprinting estimator is consistent, and hence robust against spurious regression. In the case of global mean surface temperature (GMST), parameterizing abstract linear response models in terms of energy balance provides this result with physical interpretability. Hypothesis tests conducted using observations of historical GMST and simulation output from 13 CMIP6 general circulation models produced no evidence that standard assumptions required for consistency were violated. It is therefore concluded that, at least in the case of GMST, detection and attribution of climate change trends is very likely not spurious regression. Furthermore, detection of significant cointegration between observations and model output indicates that the least-squares estimator is “superconsistent”, with better convergence properties than might previously have been assumed. Finally, a new method has been developed for quantifying D&A uncertainty, exploiting the notion of cointegration to eliminate the need for pre-industrial control simulations.

Anthropogenic global warming hypothesis: testing its robustness by Granger causality analysis

Sequential tests of causality between environmental time series: With application to the global warming theory

Granger Causality Test for Detection and Attribution of Climate Change

On the causal structure between CO 2 and global temperature

External Control of 20th Century Temperature by Natural and Anthropogenic Forcings

Debates on the Causes of Global Warming

Scaling fluctuation analysis and statistical hypothesis testing of anthropogenic warming

Memory Matters: A Case for Granger Causality in Climate Variability Studies

Empirical estimation of anthropogenic and natural contributions to surface air temperature trends at different latitudes

Uncertainties in the attribution of greenhouse gas warming and implications for climate prediction

Earth climate identification vs. anthropic global warming attribution

Global Warming: some back-of-the-envelope calculations

Causes of climate change over the historical record

Attributing Observed SST Trends and Subcontinental Land Warming to Anthropogenic Forcing during 1979–2005

Impacts of natural and anthropogenic forcings on historical and future changes in global-land surface air temperature in CMIP6–DAMIP simulations

On Spurious Causality, CO2, and Global Temperature

Could detection and attribution of climate change trends be spurious regression?

Detecting natural influence on surface air temperature change in the early twentieth century

Inference Related to Common Breaks in a Multivariate System with Joined Segmented Trends with Applications to Global and Hemispheric Temperatures

Detection and Attribution of Climate Change: a Regional Perspective

The Granger Causality Test Method based on the Multiple Variables