Abstract:Peer assessment (PA) is employed as one fundamental practice of classroom-based assessment in terms of its learning-oriented and formative nature. The exercise of peer assessment has multiple and additional benefits for student learning. However, research into the learning processes in peer assessment is scarce both in theory and in practice, making it difficult to evaluate and pinpoint its value as a tool in assessment as learning (AaL). This study focuses both on the learning process and outcome through assessment activities. We set out with three goals in mind: (1) to examine students' assessment performance in context, (2) to evaluate its impact on student progress, and (3) to illuminate teachers on organizing assessment activities. Three specific research questions are answered in this study: (1) How do student raters perform in the process of PA in an advanced English class? (2) To what extent do assessment activities influence the students' speaking ability? (3) What are students' perceptions of PA regarding its benefits and caveats? A total of 29 undergraduate students participated in two assessment activities on argumentative speaking. Many-Facet Rasch Model analysis was conducted to measure the rater effects both at the group level and the individual level. Bias/interaction analyses were performed to diagnose rater behavior in different contexts including the rating session, speaking session, and peer assessment vs. self-assessment. Questionnaire and semi-structured interview data were also collected to explore factors and strategies that could interfere with PA as AaL. Results show that students exhibited stable rating behavior and made progress in argumentative speaking in all dimensions, including delivery, organization, and language use. They are more stringent with themselves than with peers although there is one rare case with a bias against peers. Participants acknowledged the benefits of PA but also shared reasonable concerns in practice. This study validated the feasibility and the effectiveness of PA for student learning. Discussion on findings and guidelines for effective implementation of PA as AaL are provided.

The Use of Peer Assessment as an Inclusive Learning Strategy in Higher Education Institutions

PEER AND TEACHER ASSESSMENT OF ACADEMIC ESSAY WRITING: PROCEDURE AND CORRESPONDENCE

Peer Assessment in Undergraduate Programmes

Peer and self-assessment practices for writing across the curriculum: learner-differentiated effects on writing achievement

Assessment as Learning: How Does Peer Assessment Function in Students' Learning?

Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities

Online self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student-teachers’ assessment skills

Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education

Problem-based learning, self- and peer assessment in higher education: towards advancing lifelong learning skills

Differential impacts of e-portfolio assessment on language learners’ engagement modes and genre-based writing improvement

Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs

“We learn from each other”: peer review writing practices in English for Academic Purposes

Peer Feedback Improves Students’ Academic Self-Concept in Higher Education

Peer assessment as a learning and self-assessment tool: a look inside the black box

Peer review in the classroom: student perceptions, peer feedback quality and the role of assessment

Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions

Students’ Attitudes Toward Peer Feedback: Paving a Way for Students’ English Writing Improvement

A Study of Peer Assessment of English Writing in High School

Medical Students' Perceptions of Peer Assessment in a Problem-based Learning Curriculum

Peer Assessment in a Blended Translation Course: Students’ Perceptions, Motivation and their Self-perceived Translational Skill Development

Who engaged in the team-based assessment? Leveraging EdTech for a self and intra-team peer-assessment solution to free-riding