Abstract:Peer assessment (PA) is employed as one fundamental practice of classroom-based assessment in terms of its learning-oriented and formative nature. The exercise of peer assessment has multiple and additional benefits for student learning. However, research into the learning processes in peer assessment is scarce both in theory and in practice, making it difficult to evaluate and pinpoint its value as a tool in assessment as learning (AaL). This study focuses both on the learning process and outcome through assessment activities. We set out with three goals in mind: (1) to examine students' assessment performance in context, (2) to evaluate its impact on student progress, and (3) to illuminate teachers on organizing assessment activities. Three specific research questions are answered in this study: (1) How do student raters perform in the process of PA in an advanced English class? (2) To what extent do assessment activities influence the students' speaking ability? (3) What are students' perceptions of PA regarding its benefits and caveats? A total of 29 undergraduate students participated in two assessment activities on argumentative speaking. Many-Facet Rasch Model analysis was conducted to measure the rater effects both at the group level and the individual level. Bias/interaction analyses were performed to diagnose rater behavior in different contexts including the rating session, speaking session, and peer assessment vs. self-assessment. Questionnaire and semi-structured interview data were also collected to explore factors and strategies that could interfere with PA as AaL. Results show that students exhibited stable rating behavior and made progress in argumentative speaking in all dimensions, including delivery, organization, and language use. They are more stringent with themselves than with peers although there is one rare case with a bias against peers. Participants acknowledged the benefits of PA but also shared reasonable concerns in practice. This study validated the feasibility and the effectiveness of PA for student learning. Discussion on findings and guidelines for effective implementation of PA as AaL are provided.

Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions

Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments

A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors

Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities

Assessment as Learning: How Does Peer Assessment Function in Students' Learning?

Engaging Software Engineering Students in Grading: The effects of peer assessment on self-evaluation, motivation, and study time

Systematic Review of Approaches to Improve Peer Assessment at Scale

Peer assessment, self-assessment, and resultant feedback: an examination of feasibility and reliability

Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis

Peer-assisted interventions: Early promises, notable achievements, and future aspirations

Factors That Determine the Perceived Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Collaborative Learning: a Mixed Methods Design

Peer assessment in MOOCs: Systematic literature review

Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs

Peer Feedback Improves Students’ Academic Self-Concept in Higher Education

Online Versus Offline Peer Feedback in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis

Midterm peer feedback in problem-based learning groups: the effect on individual contributions and achievement

Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment

The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies

Goals of peer assessment and their associated quality concepts

Peer and self-assessment practices for writing across the curriculum: learner-differentiated effects on writing achievement

Research trends and applications of technology-supported peer assessment: a review of selected journal publications from 2007 to 2016