Abstract:Peer assessment (PA) is employed as one fundamental practice of classroom-based assessment in terms of its learning-oriented and formative nature. The exercise of peer assessment has multiple and additional benefits for student learning. However, research into the learning processes in peer assessment is scarce both in theory and in practice, making it difficult to evaluate and pinpoint its value as a tool in assessment as learning (AaL). This study focuses both on the learning process and outcome through assessment activities. We set out with three goals in mind: (1) to examine students' assessment performance in context, (2) to evaluate its impact on student progress, and (3) to illuminate teachers on organizing assessment activities. Three specific research questions are answered in this study: (1) How do student raters perform in the process of PA in an advanced English class? (2) To what extent do assessment activities influence the students' speaking ability? (3) What are students' perceptions of PA regarding its benefits and caveats? A total of 29 undergraduate students participated in two assessment activities on argumentative speaking. Many-Facet Rasch Model analysis was conducted to measure the rater effects both at the group level and the individual level. Bias/interaction analyses were performed to diagnose rater behavior in different contexts including the rating session, speaking session, and peer assessment vs. self-assessment. Questionnaire and semi-structured interview data were also collected to explore factors and strategies that could interfere with PA as AaL. Results show that students exhibited stable rating behavior and made progress in argumentative speaking in all dimensions, including delivery, organization, and language use. They are more stringent with themselves than with peers although there is one rare case with a bias against peers. Participants acknowledged the benefits of PA but also shared reasonable concerns in practice. This study validated the feasibility and the effectiveness of PA for student learning. Discussion on findings and guidelines for effective implementation of PA as AaL are provided.

A Study of Peer Assessment of English Writing in High School

Comparative Study about the Impacts of Chinese Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) Feedback and Teacher Feedback on Middle School Students’ Writing Practice

The Impact of Peer Feedback on Chinese EFL Junior High School Students’ Writing Performance

The role and features of peer assessment feedback in college English writing

A Brief Study on Peer Feedback in College English Writing Teaching

Peer and self-assessment practices for writing across the curriculum: learner-differentiated effects on writing achievement

Students’ Attitudes Toward Peer Feedback: Paving a Way for Students’ English Writing Improvement

Understanding the Difference Between Self-Feedback and Peer Feedback: A Comparative Study of Their Effects on Undergraduate Students' Writing Improvement

A Study on the Application of Reading-to-Write Approach in Senior High English Writing Classes

Study on Students’ Engagement of Different Writing Levels in the Process of Peer Feedback of English Writing in the Junior High School

Assessment as Learning: How Does Peer Assessment Function in Students' Learning?

Exploring the Impact of Online Peer Assessment Modules on the Feedback for English Writing by Chinese High School Students

Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment

Effect of Scaffolding and Peer Review on Learning in a PAD Class

Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities

Attitudes Towards Peer Review and Reaction to Peer Feedback in Chinese EFL Writing Classrooms

Incorporating peer feedback in writing instruction: examining its effects on Chinese English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners’ writing performance

Promoting Peer Feedback in Developing Students’ English Writing Ability in L2 Writing Class

Research on the Effect of Peer Feedback Training in English Writing Teaching—A Case Study of Students in Business English Major

Self-assessment complements peer assessment for undergraduate students in an academic writing task

A Review of the Research on the Evaluation of High School English Writing Portfolio