Abstract:Peer assessment (PA) is employed as one fundamental practice of classroom-based assessment in terms of its learning-oriented and formative nature. The exercise of peer assessment has multiple and additional benefits for student learning. However, research into the learning processes in peer assessment is scarce both in theory and in practice, making it difficult to evaluate and pinpoint its value as a tool in assessment as learning (AaL). This study focuses both on the learning process and outcome through assessment activities. We set out with three goals in mind: (1) to examine students' assessment performance in context, (2) to evaluate its impact on student progress, and (3) to illuminate teachers on organizing assessment activities. Three specific research questions are answered in this study: (1) How do student raters perform in the process of PA in an advanced English class? (2) To what extent do assessment activities influence the students' speaking ability? (3) What are students' perceptions of PA regarding its benefits and caveats? A total of 29 undergraduate students participated in two assessment activities on argumentative speaking. Many-Facet Rasch Model analysis was conducted to measure the rater effects both at the group level and the individual level. Bias/interaction analyses were performed to diagnose rater behavior in different contexts including the rating session, speaking session, and peer assessment vs. self-assessment. Questionnaire and semi-structured interview data were also collected to explore factors and strategies that could interfere with PA as AaL. Results show that students exhibited stable rating behavior and made progress in argumentative speaking in all dimensions, including delivery, organization, and language use. They are more stringent with themselves than with peers although there is one rare case with a bias against peers. Participants acknowledged the benefits of PA but also shared reasonable concerns in practice. This study validated the feasibility and the effectiveness of PA for student learning. Discussion on findings and guidelines for effective implementation of PA as AaL are provided.

Effect of Scaffolding and Peer Review on Learning in a PAD Class

A Comparison of Peer Review and Teacher Review in the Writing Course for English Majors

Attitudes Towards Peer Review and Reaction to Peer Feedback in Chinese EFL Writing Classrooms

An Empirical Study of College English PAD Class Based on Self-Determination Theory

Learning to Improve the Quality Peer Feedback Through Experience with Peer Feedback

Analysis of the Improvement and Practical Effectiveness of the PAD Class Teaching Model

PAD Class:A New Attempt in University Teaching Reform

Students’ Attitudes Toward Peer Feedback: Paving a Way for Students’ English Writing Improvement

The efficacy of integrating Padlet-mediated feedback into writing lessons: A case of low-proficiency students

The impact of Danmaku-based and synchronous peer feedback on L2 oral performance: A mixed-method investigation

A Study of Peer Assessment of English Writing in High School

Assessment as Learning: How Does Peer Assessment Function in Students' Learning?

Reading Classical Literary Works and Peer Review

Effectiveness of peer review as cooperative web-based learning method applied out-of-class in a role playing game: A case study by quasi-experimental approach

Assessment of Programming Language Learning Based on Peer Code Review Model: Implementation and Experience Report

Promoting Peer Feedback in Developing Students’ English Writing Ability in L2 Writing Class

Peer Feedback in Graduates′ English Writing

Incorporating peer feedback in writing instruction: examining its effects on Chinese English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners’ writing performance

The PAD Class, a New Paradigm for University Classroom Teaching

The Construction of College English Teaching Model Based on PAD Class

Exploring the Impact of Online Peer Assessment Modules on the Feedback for English Writing by Chinese High School Students