Abstract:Educational resources, such as web apps and self-directed tutorials, have become popular tools for teaching and active learning. Ideally, students - the intended users of these resources - should be involved in the resource development stage. However, in practice students often only interact with fully developed resources, when it might be too late to incorporate changes. Previous work has addressed this by involving students in the development of new resources via in-person focus groups and interviews. In these, the resource developers observe students interacting with the resource. This allows developers to incorporate their observations and students' direct feedback into further development of the resource. However, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, carrying out in-person focus groups became infeasible due to social distancing restrictions. Instead, online meetings and classes became ubiquitous. In this work, we describe a fully-online methodology to evaluate new resources in development. Specifically, our methodology consists of carrying out student focus groups via online video conferencing software. We assessed two educational resources for introductory statistics using our methodology and found that the online setting allowed us to obtain rich, detailed information from the students. We also found online focus groups to be more efficient: students and researchers did not need to travel and scheduling was not restricted by the availability of physical space. Our findings suggest that online focus groups are an attractive alternative to in-person focus groups for student assessment of resources in development, even now that pandemic restrictions are being eased.

‘Things living in the cyber-universe’: facilitating peer workshopping in the online creative non-fiction classroom

Reclaiming the technology of higher education for teaching digital writing in a post—pandemic world

Applying online peer feedback via a peer review application in English academic writing

Investigating the Impact of Structured Knowledge Feedback on Collaborative Academic Writing

Making tacit knowledge explicit: the case for online peer feedback in the studio critique

Kickstarting creative collaboration: placing authentic feedback at the heart of online digital media education

Creating an online community of inquiry: learner practice and perceptions of community-based feedback giving in academic writing

Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: an analysis of empirical research

Evaluating a Structured Online Peer Evaluation System Among Graduate-Level Communication Capstone Students Through Action Research

Research: “It Doesn’t Feel Like a Conversation”: Digital Field Experiences and Preservice Teachers’ Conceptions of Writing Response

Online Versus Offline Peer Feedback in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis

Investigating student use and value of e-learning resources to develop academic writing within the discipline of environmental science

Providing Online Feedback Using an AI Proof-reading Tool to Enhance Student Surface-Level Writing Skills

Making peer feedback work: the contribution of technology-mediated dialogic peer feedback to feedback uptake and literacy

Writing on Social Media: a Review of Research in the High School Classroom

Collaborative writing at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment

Acknowledging another face in the virtual crowd: Reimagining the online experience in higher education through an online pedagogy of care

Using online student focus groups in the development of new educational resources

Bringing the Studio Home: Fostering Socially Engaged Arts Education and Sustainability in Online Learning

Students' Engagement in Anonymous Peer Review: Using the Open-Source Sakai Platform

Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity