Abstract:Background: The structured system for peer assisted learning in writing named Paired Writing (Topping, 1995) incorporates both metacognitive prompting and scaffolding for the interactive process. Aim: This study sought to evaluate the relative contribution of these two components to student gain in quality of writing and attitudes to writing, while controlling for amount of writing practice and teacher effects. Sample: Participants were 28 ten- and eleven-year-old students forming a problematic mixed ability class. Methods: All received training in Paired Writing and its inherent metacognitive prompting. Students matched by gender and pre-test writing scores were assigned randomly to Interaction or No Interaction conditions. In the Interaction condition, the more able writers became 'tutors' for the less able. In the No Interaction condition, the more able writers acted as controls for the tutors and the less able as controls for the tutees. Over six weeks, the paired writers produced five pieces of personal writing collaboratively, while children in the No Interaction condition did so alone. Results: On pre- and post-project analyses of the quality of individual writing, all groups showed statistically significant improvements in writing. However, the pre-post gains of the children who wrote interactively were significantly greater than those of the lone writers. There was some evidence that the paired writers also had more positive self-esteem as writers. Conclusion: The operation and durability of the Paired Writing system are discussed.

Collaborative writing at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment

Investigating the Impact of Structured Knowledge Feedback on Collaborative Academic Writing

Collaborative peer feedback in L2 writing: Affective, behavioral, cognitive, and social engagement

Peer-to-peer dialogue about teachers’ written feedback enhances students’ understanding on how to improve writing skills

Promoting student engagement with feedback: insights from collaborative pedagogy and teacher feedback

Feedback, feedback-on-feedback and re-feedback: effects of written dialogic peer feedback on English as a foreign language writing

To peer or not to peer: A controlled peer-editing intervention measuring writing self-efficacy in South Korean higher education

Making peer feedback work: the contribution of technology-mediated dialogic peer feedback to feedback uptake and literacy

“We learn from each other”: peer review writing practices in English for Academic Purposes

Teacher-written feedback in L2 writing education: Insights into student tensions and responses

Developing Writing Through Blogs and Peer Feedback

Peer feedback and teacher feedback: a comparative study of revision effectiveness in writing instruction for EFL learners

Tackling the challenge of peer learning in hybrid and online universities

Peer feedback to support collaborative knowledge improvement: What kind of feedback feed-forward?

Creating an online community of inquiry: learner practice and perceptions of community-based feedback giving in academic writing

Effectiveness of Teacher and Peer Feedback in EFL Writing: A Case of High School Students

Factors influencing students’ peer feedback uptake: instructional design matters

Comparing peer, ChatGPT, and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing: Students' perceptions and preferences

Fostering accuracy in L2 writing: impact of different types of corrective feedback in an experimental blended learning EFL course

Students’ Attitudes Toward Peer Feedback: Paving a Way for Students’ English Writing Improvement

Collaborative writing: the effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction