Abstract:Prior studies have reported inconsistent findings with regard to the effects of small-group student talk on developing individual students’ English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) writing ability. To further explore the question under discussion, we designed a quasi-experimental study that included a pretest, a posttest, and a delayed posttest, and implemented it in two English-major groups at a university in China. We randomly assigned the students to an intervention group and a comparison group to investigate whether employing structured small-group student talk as collaborative prewriting discussions would effectively facilitate individual students’ EFL writing development and whether such effects could be retained. The immediate and sustained effects after the quasi-experimental study was completed were measured by the analytic scores on five components of the writing task (content, organization, vocabulary, language, and mechanics) and the holistic writing scores cumulated of all these components. Statistical analyses revealed that the two groups were significantly distinguished by their analytic and holistic scores, indicating that students in the intervention group outperformed their comparison group peers in writing performance. The effects of collaborative prewriting discussions in the form of structured small-group student talk were found statistically significant in facilitating students’ writing improvement in the content, organization, vocabulary, and language use, but not mechanics. The effects on content, organization, and vocabulary were retained as seen from the delayed posttest, while those on language use were not. The comparison group showed little improvement in their writing performance across the three tests. We concluded this study with a discussion on the implications for English-as-a-second/foreign-language (L2) writing instruction.

Investigating the Impact of Structured Knowledge Feedback on Collaborative Academic Writing

Examining the Effects of a Real-Time, Knowledge-Aware Tool for Academic Writing Assessment

Promoting knowledge elaboration, socially shared regulation, and group performance in collaborative learning: an automated assessment and feedback approach based on knowledge graphs

Promoting English Academic Writing in a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environment

Examining the Impact of Teacher Scaffolding in the Knowledge Building Environment: Insights from Students’ Interaction Patterns, Social Epistemic Networks, and Academic Performance

Creating an online community of inquiry: learner practice and perceptions of community-based feedback giving in academic writing

Collaborative writing at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment

Promoting student engagement with feedback: insights from collaborative pedagogy and teacher feedback

Using Learning Analytics to Support Engagement in Collaborative Writing

Feedback, feedback-on-feedback and re-feedback: effects of written dialogic peer feedback on English as a foreign language writing

Collaborative peer feedback in L2 writing: Affective, behavioral, cognitive, and social engagement

Educating L2 Learners about Collaborative Writing: Exploring the Relationship Between Knowledge of Collaborative Writing and Writing Products

Effects of structured small-group student talk as collaborative prewriting discussions on Chinese university EFL students’ individual writing: A quasi-experimental study

Effects of Group Awareness Tools on Students' Engagement, Performance, and Perceptions in Online Collaborative Writing: Intergroup Information Matters

Effects of Writing Feedback Literacies on Feedback Engagement and Writing Performance: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective

Exploiting the potential of peer feedback: The combined use of face-to-face feedback and e-feedback in doctoral writing groups

Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: an analysis of empirical research

Exploring Student Engagement with Peer Feedback on L2 Writing

Research on Application of Collaborative Knowledge Building in Blended Language Classroom Teaching.

Peer-to-peer dialogue about teachers’ written feedback enhances students’ understanding on how to improve writing skills