Abstract:BACKGROUND: Scientific research into mental health outcomes following trauma is undergoing a revolution as scientists refocus their efforts to identify underlying dimensions of health and psychopathology. This effort is in stark contrast to the previous focus which was to characterize individuals based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) diagnostic status (Insel et al., 2010). A significant unresolved issue underlying this shift is how to characterize clinically relevant populations without reliance on the categorical definitions provided by the DSM. Classifying individuals based on their pattern of stress adaptation over time holds significant promise for capturing inherent inter-individual heterogeneity as responses including chronicity, recovery, delayed onset, and resilience can only be determined longitudinally (Galatzer-Levy & Bryant, 2013) and then characterizing these patterns for future research (Depaoli, Van de Schoot, Van Loey, & Sijbrandij, 2015). Such an approach allows for the identification of phenominologically similar patterns of response to diverse extreme environmental stressors (Bonanno, Kennedy, Galatzer-Levy, Lude, & Elfstom, 2012; Galatzer-Levy & Bonanno, 2012; Galatzer-Levy, Brown, et al., 2013; Galatzer-Levy, Burton, & Bonanno, 2012) including translational animal models of stress adaptation (Galatzer-Levy, Bonanno, Bush, & LeDoux, 2013; Galatzer-Levy, Moscarello, et al., 2014). The empirical identification of heterogeneous stress response patterns can increase the identification of mechanisms (Galatzer-Levy, Steenkamp, et al., 2014), consequences (Galatzer-Levy & Bonanno, 2014), treatment effects (Galatzer-Levy, Ankri, et al., 2013), and prediction (Galatzer-Levy, Karstoft, Statnikov, & Shalev, 2014) of individual differences in response to trauma.METHOD: METHODological and theoretical considerations for the application of Latent Growth Mixture Modeling (LGMM) and allied methods such as Latent Class Growth Analysis (LCGA) for the identification of heterogeneous populations defined by their pattern of change over time will be presented (Van De Schoot, 2015). Common pitfalls including non-identification, over identification, and issues related to model specification will be discussed as well as the benefits of applying such methods along with the theoretical grounding of such approaches.CONCLUSIONS: LGMM and allied methods have significant potential for improving the science of stress pathology as well as our understanding of healthy adaptation (resilience).

Latent growth modeling with domain-specific outcomes comprised of mixed response types in intervention studies.

Modeling of Correlated Cognitive Function and Functional Disability Outcomes with Bounded and Missing Data in a Longitudinal Aging Study

Understanding Variation in Longitudinal Data Using Latent Growth Mixture Modeling

Bayesian Latent-Class Mixed-Effect Hybrid Models for Dyadic Longitudinal Data with Non-Ignorable Dropouts.

Flexible Bayesian Modeling for Longitudinal Binary and Ordinal Responses

Modeling Heterogeneity and Missing Data of Multiple Longitudinal Outcomes in Electronic Health Records

Growth modeling with nonignorable dropout: Alternative analyses of the STAR*D antidepressant trial.

Applications of Latent Growth Mixture Modeling and allied methods to posttraumatic stress response data

Latent class growth analysis for ordinal response data in the Distress Assessment and Response Tool: an evaluation of state-of-the-art implementations

Bayesian Methods and Model Selection for Latent Growth Curve Models with Missing Data

Growth mixture models: a case example of the longitudinal analysis of patient-reported outcomes data captured by a clinical registry

Joint models for the longitudinal analysis of measurement scales in the presence of informative dropout

Mixed‐Effect Hybrid Models for Longitudinal Data with Nonignorable Dropout

Modeling Multivariate Mixed-Response Functional Data

Longitudinal Modeling of Age-Dependent Latent Traits with Generalized Additive Latent and Mixed Models

Using Bayesian item response theory for multicohort repeated measure design to estimate individual latent change scores.

Latent Growth Curve Models

Modeling repeated self-reported outcome data: A continuous-time longitudinal Item Response Theory model

Modeling construct change over time amidst potential changes in construct measurement: A longitudinal moderated factor analysis approach

Interaction Effects in Latent Growth Models: Evaluation of Alternative Estimation Approaches