Abstract:Whether and how people regulate their negative emotions matters a great deal. However, it is not yet clear why people regulate as they do. One promising idea is that people's beliefs shape their emotion regulation choices, and initial evidence indicates that individuals' dispositional beliefs about emotions are indeed associated with general patterns of emotion regulation. The present study extends prior work on emotion beliefs to better understand how occurrent (i.e., momentary) beliefs about helpfulness, controllability, and justification of specific emotions shape whether and how people regulate negative emotions in everyday life. Participants (N = 143; U.S. community college students recruited in 2022; 76% female; age = 18-60) completed a 7-day experience-sampling protocol in which they were pinged three times per day to describe their most recent negative experiences and answer questions about their emotions, occurrent beliefs about emotions, and emotion regulation. With respect to whether people regulate their emotions, results reveal that people regulate their emotions more when they perceive them to be less helpful. Exploratory analyses additionally show that people regulate negative emotions more when they perceive them to be more controllable and when emotional intensity is relatively high. In terms of how people regulate their emotions, people are more likely to use reappraisal when emotions are seen as more helpful, more controllable, and less justified; and more likely to use distraction when emotions are seen as less helpful and more justified. These findings contribute to a more fine-grained understanding of how beliefs shape emotion regulation in everyday life.respect to whether people regulate their emotions, results reveal that people regulate their emotions more when they perceive them to be less helpful. Exploratory analyses additionally show that people regulate negative emotions more when they perceive them to be more controllable and when emotional intensity is relatively high. In terms of how people regulate their emotions, people are more likely to use reappraisal when emotions are seen as more helpful, more controllable, and less justified; and more likely to use distraction when emotions are seen as less helpful and more justified. These findings contribute to a more fine-grained understanding of how beliefs shape emotion regulation (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Data versus Spock: lay theories about whether emotion helps or hinders

Neural Responses During Emotion Transitions and Emotion Regulation

How emotions affect logical reasoning: evidence from experiments with mood-manipulated participants, spider phobics, and people with exam anxiety

An experimental and simulation study of the impact of emotional information on analogical reasoning

Discrete emotions predict changes in cognition, judgment, experience, behavior, and physiology: A meta-analysis of experimental emotion elicitations.

Occurrent beliefs about emotions predict emotion regulation in everyday life.

Naïve theories of emotions: Why people might (not) be uncertain or in conflict about felt emotions

Is it true that negative emotions cause more utilitarian judgements? from the influence of emotion and cognition

One size does not fit all: Decomposing the implementation and differential benefits of social emotion regulation strategies.

Does interpersonal emotion regulation effort pay off?

Emotion Regulation, Parasympathetic Function, and Psychological Well-Being

The Influence of Emotion and Empathy on Decisions to Help Others

How Emotion Shapes Behavior: Feedback, Anticipation, and Reflection, Rather Than Direct Causation

Fear, anger, and risk.

Is emotional support the key to improving emotion regulation? A machine learning approach

Is positive emotion an amplifier or a buffer? It depends: Dialectical thinking moderates the impact of positive emotion on intergroup conflicts.

Emotion, working memory task demands and individual differences predict behavior, cognitive effort and negative affect

Emotion Regulation by Psychological Distance and Level of Abstraction: Two Meta-Analyses

Do people essentialize emotions? Individual differences in emotion essentialism and emotional experience.

Regulating others' emotions: An exploratory study of everyday extrinsic emotion regulation in university students

A cognition-emotion-action sequence: Anticipated emotional consequences of causal attributions and reported communication strategy.