Abstract:Whether and how people regulate their negative emotions matters a great deal. However, it is not yet clear why people regulate as they do. One promising idea is that people's beliefs shape their emotion regulation choices, and initial evidence indicates that individuals' dispositional beliefs about emotions are indeed associated with general patterns of emotion regulation. The present study extends prior work on emotion beliefs to better understand how occurrent (i.e., momentary) beliefs about helpfulness, controllability, and justification of specific emotions shape whether and how people regulate negative emotions in everyday life. Participants (N = 143; U.S. community college students recruited in 2022; 76% female; age = 18-60) completed a 7-day experience-sampling protocol in which they were pinged three times per day to describe their most recent negative experiences and answer questions about their emotions, occurrent beliefs about emotions, and emotion regulation. With respect to whether people regulate their emotions, results reveal that people regulate their emotions more when they perceive them to be less helpful. Exploratory analyses additionally show that people regulate negative emotions more when they perceive them to be more controllable and when emotional intensity is relatively high. In terms of how people regulate their emotions, people are more likely to use reappraisal when emotions are seen as more helpful, more controllable, and less justified; and more likely to use distraction when emotions are seen as less helpful and more justified. These findings contribute to a more fine-grained understanding of how beliefs shape emotion regulation in everyday life.respect to whether people regulate their emotions, results reveal that people regulate their emotions more when they perceive them to be less helpful. Exploratory analyses additionally show that people regulate negative emotions more when they perceive them to be more controllable and when emotional intensity is relatively high. In terms of how people regulate their emotions, people are more likely to use reappraisal when emotions are seen as more helpful, more controllable, and less justified; and more likely to use distraction when emotions are seen as less helpful and more justified. These findings contribute to a more fine-grained understanding of how beliefs shape emotion regulation (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Regulating others' emotions: An exploratory study of everyday extrinsic emotion regulation in university students

The Role of Healthcare Leaders’ Regulation of Followers’ Emotions on Follower Wellbeing

Effectiveness of extrinsic emotion regulation strategies in text-based online communication.

Emotion regulation in action: Use, selection, and success of emotion regulation in adolescents’ daily lives

How can I help?: Specific strategies used in interpersonal emotion regulation in a relationship context.

Does interpersonal emotion regulation effort pay off?

Interpersonal Emotion Regulation: an Experience Sampling Study

Back to basics: A naturalistic assessment of the experience and regulation of emotion.

The Interplay of Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Emotion Regulation Strategies in College Students

Knowing me, knowing you: Are people good at regulating their emotions good at regulating another’s emotions?

What empathizers do: Empathy and the selection of everyday interpersonal emotion regulation strategies

Emotion regulation in everyday life: Mapping global self-reports to daily processes.

Emotion regulation strategy selection in daily life: The role of social context and goals

Contextual variations in emotion polyregulation: How do regulatory goals shape the use and success of emotion regulation strategies in everyday life?

Occurrent beliefs about emotions predict emotion regulation in everyday life.

Emotion regulation strategies in daily life: mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal and emotion suppression

One size does not fit all: Decomposing the implementation and differential benefits of social emotion regulation strategies.

Social dynamics in interpersonal emotion regulation: A theoretical framework for understanding direct and indirect other-based processes

Understanding students' emotion regulation strategy selection using network analysis approach

The Multilevel Structure of Daily Emotion-Regulation-Strategy Use: An Examination of Within- and Between-Person Associations in Naturalistic Settings

Emotion Regulation in the Classroom: A Network Approach to Model Relations among Emotion Regulation Difficulties, Engagement to Learn, and Relationships with Peers and Teachers