Abstract:This article provides an applied analysis of the social network technologies used by Western IT-companies to exert a direct or indirect influence on political processes. The study focuses on a set of tools that were employed to shape the media landscape during the 2020 presidential election campaign in the United States. Overall, the empirical observations suggest that the largest networking services (such as Facebook, Twitter, Google, YouTube, etc.) more or less contributed to the success of the Democratic candidate. Having studied the relevant U.S. experience, the authors identify a set of manipulative techniques used by social network administrators to form specific electoral attitudes among users. These include blocking accounts; setting up search algorithms to produce pre-programmed results; labeling ideologically objectionable materials as “fake”, “untrustworthy”, “manipulative” and “potentially dangerous”; automatically recommending certain materials for viewing; and removing or pessimizing unwanted content. Seeking to expand their own audience, social networks flood the media space with so-called “partisan” content, which is vigorously welcomed by one part of society and just as vigorously rejected by another. This leads to polarization and radicalization of the masses. The most destructive consequences of this process can be witnessed in the United States, where Democrat and Republican supporters become not just political opponents but real antagonists. Social media, search engines and news aggregators, developing their capacity as political actors, pave the way to a qualitative change in the established electoral practices. The greatest concern is the ability of IT-companies to manipulate the political consciousness and behavior of citizens during crucial election campaigns. Considering this circumstance, the authors raise a question about the need to regulate the political and communication processes unfolding on the Internet platforms.

Hacking the citizenry?: Personality profiling, ‘big data’ and the election of Donald Trump

Could Cambridge Analytica Have Delivered Donald Trump’s 2016 Presidential Victory? An Anthropologist’s Look at Big Data and Political Campaigning

Experiments in Social Media

Modern technologies of social management in the US political process (using the example of the 2020 presidential election campaign)

Can electoral popularity be predicted using socially generated big data?

Who Falls for Online Political Manipulation?

Digital data and personality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human perception and computer prediction.

Investigating Coordinated 'Social' Targeting of High-Profile Twitter Accounts

Disinformation and Social Bot Operations in the Run Up to the 2017 French Presidential Election

Automatically Identifying Political Ads on Facebook: Towards Understanding of Manipulation via User Targeting

Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior

Digital Phenotyping of Big Five Personality via Facebook Data Mining: A Meta-Analysis

Predicting the 2020 US Presidential Election with Twitter

Facebook, trust and privacy in an election year: Balancing politics and advertising

The President Is in: Public Opinion and the Presidential Use of Twitter

Analyzing and Estimating Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter Polls

Validation of Twitter opinion trends with national polling aggregates: Hillary Clinton vs Donald Trump

Global Reactions to the Cambridge Analytica Scandal: An Inter-Language Social Media Study

Deepfakes, trolls and cybertroopers: how social media could sway elections in 2024

Not our kind of crowd! How partisan bias distorts perceptions of political bots on Twitter (now X)

Disintermediation and disinformation as a political strategy: use of AI to analyse fake news as Trump’s rhetorical resource on Twitter