Abstract:This article provides an applied analysis of the social network technologies used by Western IT-companies to exert a direct or indirect influence on political processes. The study focuses on a set of tools that were employed to shape the media landscape during the 2020 presidential election campaign in the United States. Overall, the empirical observations suggest that the largest networking services (such as Facebook, Twitter, Google, YouTube, etc.) more or less contributed to the success of the Democratic candidate. Having studied the relevant U.S. experience, the authors identify a set of manipulative techniques used by social network administrators to form specific electoral attitudes among users. These include blocking accounts; setting up search algorithms to produce pre-programmed results; labeling ideologically objectionable materials as “fake”, “untrustworthy”, “manipulative” and “potentially dangerous”; automatically recommending certain materials for viewing; and removing or pessimizing unwanted content. Seeking to expand their own audience, social networks flood the media space with so-called “partisan” content, which is vigorously welcomed by one part of society and just as vigorously rejected by another. This leads to polarization and radicalization of the masses. The most destructive consequences of this process can be witnessed in the United States, where Democrat and Republican supporters become not just political opponents but real antagonists. Social media, search engines and news aggregators, developing their capacity as political actors, pave the way to a qualitative change in the established electoral practices. The greatest concern is the ability of IT-companies to manipulate the political consciousness and behavior of citizens during crucial election campaigns. Considering this circumstance, the authors raise a question about the need to regulate the political and communication processes unfolding on the Internet platforms.

Deepfakes, trolls and cybertroopers: how social media could sway elections in 2024

Who Falls for Online Political Manipulation?

Deepfake Cases in the 2024 Lok Sabha Election: Impact and Implications for Democracy

Deepfakes and Disinformation: Exploring the Impact of Synthetic Political Video on Deception, Uncertainty, and Trust in News

Generative artificial intelligence in the electoral processes of 2024 in the world: disinformation campaigns and online trolls

Navigating the maze: Deepfakes, cognitive ability, and social media news skepticism

A simulated cyberattack on Twitter: Assessing partisan vulnerability to spear phishing and disinformation ahead of the 2018 U.S. midterm elections

Bots, elections, and social media: a brief overview

Investigating Coordinated 'Social' Targeting of High-Profile Twitter Accounts

Modern technologies of social management in the US political process (using the example of the 2020 presidential election campaign)

Sleeper Social Bots: a new generation of AI disinformation bots are already a political threat

Social Bots and Social Media Manipulation in 2020: The Year in Review

Do deepfake videos undermine our epistemic trust? A thematic analysis of tweets that discuss deepfakes in the Russian invasion of Ukraine

Examining the Implications of Deepfakes for Election Integrity

Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security

Disinformation, Deepfakes and Democracies: The Need for Legislative Reform

How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign?

Analyzing the Digital Traces of Political Manipulation: The 2016 Russian Interference Twitter Campaign

Exposing Cross-Platform Coordinated Inauthentic Activity in the Run-Up to the 2024 U.S. Election

Beyond Trolling: Malware-Induced Misperception Attacks on Polarized Facebook Discourse

DeepFake Deception: A Comprehensive Analysis of DeepFake Technology and its Effects on Ethics, Politics and Society