Abstract:This article provides an applied analysis of the social network technologies used by Western IT-companies to exert a direct or indirect influence on political processes. The study focuses on a set of tools that were employed to shape the media landscape during the 2020 presidential election campaign in the United States. Overall, the empirical observations suggest that the largest networking services (such as Facebook, Twitter, Google, YouTube, etc.) more or less contributed to the success of the Democratic candidate. Having studied the relevant U.S. experience, the authors identify a set of manipulative techniques used by social network administrators to form specific electoral attitudes among users. These include blocking accounts; setting up search algorithms to produce pre-programmed results; labeling ideologically objectionable materials as “fake”, “untrustworthy”, “manipulative” and “potentially dangerous”; automatically recommending certain materials for viewing; and removing or pessimizing unwanted content. Seeking to expand their own audience, social networks flood the media space with so-called “partisan” content, which is vigorously welcomed by one part of society and just as vigorously rejected by another. This leads to polarization and radicalization of the masses. The most destructive consequences of this process can be witnessed in the United States, where Democrat and Republican supporters become not just political opponents but real antagonists. Social media, search engines and news aggregators, developing their capacity as political actors, pave the way to a qualitative change in the established electoral practices. The greatest concern is the ability of IT-companies to manipulate the political consciousness and behavior of citizens during crucial election campaigns. Considering this circumstance, the authors raise a question about the need to regulate the political and communication processes unfolding on the Internet platforms.

Facebook, trust and privacy in an election year: Balancing politics and advertising

Evolution of Digital Advertising Strategies during the 2020 US Presidential Primary

An Analysis of United States Online Political Advertising Transparency

Facebook Political Ads And Accountability: Outside Groups Are Most Negative, Especially When Hiding Donors

How Algorithms Shape the Distribution of Political Advertising: Case Studies of Facebook, Google, and TikTok

Modern technologies of social management in the US political process (using the example of the 2020 presidential election campaign)

Political Advertising on Social Media in the 2012 Presidential Election

The Thin Ideology of Populist Advertising on Facebook during the 2019 EU Elections

On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook

How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign?

Systematic discrepancies in the delivery of political ads on Facebook and Instagram

Political advertisement on Facebook and Instagram in the run up to 2022 Italian general election

Election Polls on Social Media: Prevalence, Biases, and Voter Fraud Beliefs

A Dip Into a Deep Well: Online Political Advertisements, Valence, and European Electoral Campaigning

Automatically Identifying Political Ads on Facebook: Towards Understanding of Manipulation via User Targeting

Technology Firms Shape Political Communication: The Work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google With Campaigns During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Cycle

Commercial Companies in Party Networks: Digital Advertising Firms in US Elections from 2006-2016

Facebook's Advertising Platform: New Attack Vectors and the Need for Interventions

Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior

Like, Post, and Distrust? How Social Media Use Affects Trust in Government

Why Am I Getting This Ad? How the Degree of Targeting Disclosures and Political Fit Affect Persuasion Knowledge, Party Evaluation, and Online Privacy Behaviors