Abstract:Significant differences in loan terms between demographically distinct groups of borrowers in the United States are often interpreted as evidence of systematic ethnic, racial or gender discrimination by lenders. The appearance and interpretation of such discrimination has long been a controversial issue in public policy and has significant implications for both the economic efficiency and equity of credit markets. Arising from concern for borrowers disadvantaged by such discrimination, the design and implementation of regulations preventing the disparate treatment of demographically distinct groups by lenders are generally considered to have enhanced the equality of access to credit. Unfortunately, existing research has not examined whether this gain in social equity comes at a cost in efficiency borne by all market participants. The reliance on adverse selection or moral hazard in current models of limited lending and credit rationing poses difficulties in empirical testing for the presence and magnitude of such costs. This paper offers a novel theoretical framework in which lending discrimination can endogenously arise in the presence of value-maximizing lenders competing in an economy with complete markets, common knowledge and arbitrage-free pricing. By avoiding the reliance of current models on the exogenous presence of adverse selection or moral hazard, this framework allows potential efficiency costs to beexamined in a market environment without an ex ante assumption of informational market failure. Owing to the presence of common knowledge among participants, we first show how equilibrium loan terms to borrowers in different demographic classes can diverge in such an efficient environment. We then apply the properties exhibited in market equilibria to measure the potential costs of misallocating credit risk owing to the type of regulations observed in actual credit markets.

'No More Credit Score': Employer Credit Check Bans and Signal Substitution

Deleting a Signal: Evidence from Pre-Employment Credit Checks

Bad Credit, No Problem? Credit and Labor Market Consequences of Bad Credit Reports

Ban The Box? Information, Incentives, and Statistical Discrimination

Residential Migration, Entry, and Exit as Seen Through the Lens of Credit Bureau Data

Inequality in high-cost borrowing and unemployment insurance generosity in US states during the COVID-19 pandemic

How Costly is Noise? Data and Disparities in Consumer Credit

How Do Machine Learning and Non-Traditional Data Affect Credit Scoring? New Evidence from a Chinese Fintech Firm

Credit Risk, Regulatory Costs and Lending Discrimination in Efficient Residential Mortgage Markets

Perpetuating wage inequality: evidence from salary history bans

Credit Scoring as a Carceral Practice: An Abolitionist Framework

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mortgage Lending: New Evidence from Expanded HMDA Data

US Salary History Bans -- Strategic Disclosure by Job Applicants and the Gender Pay Gap

Carrot or Stick? Evidence from a Pair of Randomized Field Experiments Testing Lender Information Sharing Hypotheses

Ban-the-Box Laws: Fair and Effective?

Law and order? Associations between payday lending prohibition and alternative financial services use by degree of enforcement

What if Borrowers Were Informed about Credit Reporting? Two Natural Field Experiments

Discrimination in lending? Evidence from the Paycheck Protection Program

Credit Availability for Minority Business Owners in an Evolving Credit Environment

Credit access and housing insecurity: Evidence from winter utility shutoff protections

Access to housing credit and marriage: evidence from redlining maps