Abstract:Extensive literature probes labor market discrimination through correspondence studies in which researchers send pairs of resumes to employers, which are closely matched except for social signals such as gender or ethnicity. Upon perceiving these signals, individuals quickly activate associated stereotypes. The Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske 2002) categorizes these stereotypes into two dimensions: warmth and competence. Our research integrates findings from correspondence studies with theories of social psychology, asking: Can discrimination between social groups, measured through employer callback disparities, be predicted by warmth and competence perceptions of social signals? We collect callback rates from 21 published correspondence studies, varying for 592 social signals. On those social signals, we collected warmth and competence perceptions from an independent group of online raters. We found that social perception predicts callback disparities for studies varying race and gender, which are indirectly signaled by names on these resumes. Yet, for studies adjusting other categories like sexuality and disability, the influence of social perception on callbacks is inconsistent. For instance, a more favorable perception of signals like parenthood does not consistently lead to increased callbacks, underscoring the necessity for further research. Our research offers pivotal strategies to address labor market discrimination in practice. Leveraging the warmth and competence framework allows for the predictive identification of bias against specific groups without extensive correspondence studies. By distilling hiring discrimination into these two dimensions, we not only facilitate the development of decision support systems for hiring managers but also equip computer scientists with a foundational framework for debiasing Large Language Models and other methods that are increasingly employed in hiring processes.

Deleting a Signal: Evidence from Pre-Employment Credit Checks

'No More Credit Score': Employer Credit Check Bans and Signal Substitution

Audits as Evidence: Experiments, Ensembles, and Enforcement

Bad Credit, No Problem? Credit and Labor Market Consequences of Bad Credit Reports

Ban The Box? Information, Incentives, and Statistical Discrimination

Salary History and Employer Demand: Evidence from a Two-Sided Audit

LinkedOut? A Field Experiment on Discrimination in Job Network Formation

Efficient candidate screening under multiple tests and implications for fairness

Perpetuating wage inequality: evidence from salary history bans

Perceived warmth and competence predict callback rates in meta-analyzed North American labor market experiments

Macroeconomics of Racial Disparities: Discrimination, Labor Market, and Wealth

A note on post-treatment selection in studying racial discrimination in policing

How Costly is Noise? Data and Disparities in Consumer Credit

Ban-the-Box Laws: Fair and Effective?

Access to Population-Level Signaling as a Source of Inequality

The long-run impacts of banning affirmative action in US higher education

Job Market Signaling

Credit Risk, Regulatory Costs and Lending Discrimination in Efficient Residential Mortgage Markets

US Salary History Bans -- Strategic Disclosure by Job Applicants and the Gender Pay Gap

An algorithm for removing sensitive information: application to race-independent recidivism prediction

Private Information and Insurance Rejections