Abstract:Research on discriminating behavior against ethnic minorities in everyday situations is still a rather under-researched field, since most prior research on ethnic discrimination focuses on housing markets, job markets, criminal justice, institutions or discourses. This article contributes toward filling the research-gap on everyday discrimination by bringing together prior research from sociology and social-psychology, including threat and competition theories from integration research, social identity theory, particularism-universalism theory and experimental findings on fairness norms. It conceptually advances the field by combining them into an integrated interdisciplinary approach that can examine discriminating behavior in everyday situations. This approach studies the dynamics of ingroup-outgroup relationships, fairness norms and threat in regard to negative behavior toward others (e.g., a neighbor). In particular, it focusses on the dynamics under which negative behavior is more likely toward an ethnic outgroup-person than an ingroup-person (i.e., discriminating behavior). To scrutinize the expectations derived within this framework, a factorial survey experiment was designed, implemented and analyzed (by means of multilevel mixed-effects linear regressions and average marginal effects). The survey experiment presents a hypothetical scenario between two neighbors in order to measure the effects and dynamics of ingroup-outgroup relationships, fairness norms and threat on behavior. While no significant outgroup-effect can be found in the general analysis of the main effects, more in-depth analyses show an interplay of situational cues: Outgroup-discriminating behavior becomes significantly more likely when the "actor" has low general fairness norms and/or when threat-level in a situation is low. These results foreground the importance of interdisciplinary in-depth analyses of dynamics for understanding the conditions under which discriminating behavior takes place in everyday situations—and for deriving measures that can reduce discrimination.

Segregation, Ethnic Favoritism, and the Strategic Targeting of Local Public Goods

Ethnic Diversity and Ethnic Discrimination: Explaining Local Public Goods Provision

Ethnic Favoritism in Education in Kenya

Public goods and diversity in democracies and non‐democracies

Status inequality and public goods

It’s Not Just Welfare: Racial Inequality and the Local Provision of Public Goods in the United States

How different homophily preferences mitigate and spur ethnic and value segregation: Schelling's model extended

A Heterogeneous Schelling Model for Wealth Disparity and its Effect on Segregation

Residential Micro-Segregation and Social Capital in Lima, Peru

An uneven landscape of public services for people of color: identifying endogeneity in the relationship between local race composition and public expenditure

Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision in China

Beyond Preference: Modelling Segregation under Regulation.

Administrative Groupings and Equality in Public Service Provision

Reputations for treatment of outgroup members can prevent the emergence of political segregation in cooperative networks

Local Public Service Provision and Spatial Inequality in Chinese Cities

Ethnic discrimination in neighborhood ingroup-outgroup encounters: Reducing threat-perception and increasing fairness as possible solutions

Revealing Racial-Ethnic Segregation with Individual Experienced Segregation Indices Based on Social Media Data: A Case Study in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim

Placing Racial Stereotypes in Context: Social Desirability and the Politics of Racial Hostility

Wealth and Identity: The dynamics of dual segregation

The role of labor discrimination in spatial sorting: the USA as an example of ethnic groups staying apart

Should Politicians be Informed? Targeted Benefits and Heterogeneous Voters