Abstract:Despite the vast research about discrimination, there is little evidence about how space interacts with it. Our main hypothesis is that a discriminated group could have incentives to stay together, even if the location is less dynamic—avoiding areas where firms do not usually hire workers of their group. A virtuous and/or vicious circle emerges for each group, even in the long run. Using USA as an example, this article introduces a theoretical economic model to explain the incentives of ethnic groups in terms of location. We extend the well-known model of discrimination with imperfect information to a spatial framework. The results seem to indicate that the initial population distribution and the barriers to agglomerate activity (transport costs), as well as the behavior of employees, are key elements to determine the equilibrium. As a general conclusion, discrimination processes could clearly modify the location pattern of the population. Hence, the discriminated group could suffer from lower incentives to move from non-agglomerated areas to dynamic areas. These processes could help to explain why some populations prefer to maintain their traditional location in poor areas even if there are places with higher wages or better quality of life.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore how discrimination in the labor market affects the spatial distribution of different ethnic groups. Specifically, the author hypothesizes that groups subjected to discrimination may be motivated to cluster together, even if these areas are less developed than others, to avoid regions where businesses typically do not hire members of their group. By constructing a theoretical economic model, the paper seeks to explain the incentive mechanisms behind ethnic groups' choices of geographical locations. ### Background and Motivation Although research on discrimination is extensive, few studies focus on how spatial factors interact with discrimination. The author believes that groups subjected to discrimination may tend to avoid places where businesses are unwilling to hire them, forming a positive or negative feedback loop. This loop may lead to geographical segregation of different ethnic groups, even in the long term. ### Main Assumptions 1. **Groups subjected to discrimination may be motivated to cluster together**: To avoid discrimination in certain areas due to race or other reasons, these groups may choose to stay together, even if it means giving up opportunities for higher wages or better quality of life. 2. **Initial population distribution, barriers to clustering activities (such as transportation costs), and employee behavior are key factors in determining equilibrium**: These factors will influence the spatial distribution patterns of different ethnic groups. 3. **The process of discrimination may significantly alter the spatial distribution of the population**: This can explain why some groups choose to stay in traditional living areas even when they have the opportunity to move to more favorable regions. ### Research Method Using the United States as a case study, the author proposes a theoretical economic model that combines known discrimination models with a spatial framework. This model extends the classic imperfect information discrimination model by considering the incentive mechanisms behind different ethnic groups' choices of geographical locations. Through this model, the author demonstrates how discrimination leads to geographical segregation of different ethnic groups. ### Conclusion The main conclusion of the paper is that discrimination in the labor market not only affects individuals' employment opportunities and income levels but also has profound impacts on the spatial distribution of the entire society. Groups subjected to discrimination may choose to stay in traditional living areas due to a lack of suitable job opportunities in other regions, thereby exacerbating social segregation. This process can explain why some groups choose to stay in traditional living areas even when they have the opportunity to move to more favorable regions.

The role of labor discrimination in spatial sorting: the USA as an example of ethnic groups staying apart

Race, spatial mismatch, and job accessibility: evidence from a plant relocation

Winners and losers from occupational segregation across Europe: the role of gender and migration status

The persistence of spatial mismatch in metropolitan America: New evidence on disparities facing Black workers and low-wage workers

The time geography of segregation during working hours

Ethnic closure and immigrant residential segregation in Spanish working-class neighbourhoods

A Spatially Extended Model for Residential Segregation

Does the size of foreign population in a city affect the level of labour‐market discrimination against job applicants of migrant origin?

Wage Growth, Ability Sorting, and Location Choice at Labor-Force Entry: New Evidence from U.S. Census Data

Ethnic discrimination in neighborhood ingroup-outgroup encounters: Reducing threat-perception and increasing fairness as possible solutions

Immigration, Housing Discrimination and Employment

Culture in the labor market: segmentation theory and perspectives of place

Social Networks as a Mechanism for Discrimination

Language and segregation: evidence from housing markets in the United States

Mobility patterns are associated with experienced income segregation in large US cities

Disentangling individual-level from location-based income uncovers socioeconomic preferential mobility and impacts segregation estimates

Housing, urban growth and inequalities: The limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality

How different homophily preferences mitigate and spur ethnic and value segregation: Schelling's model extended

A Short-term Intervention for Long-term Fairness in the Labor Market

What You See is What You Get: Local Labor Markets and Skill Acquisition

Geographical Skills Mismatch, Job Search and Race