Inference and culture: The distinction between low context culture and high context culture as a possible explanation for cultural differences in cognition
N. Zakaria,Hiroshi Yama
Abstract:Inference and culture : The distinction between low context culture and high context culture as a possible explanation for cultural differences in cognition Hiroshi Yama (yama.hiroshi1204@gmail.com) School of Literature and Human Sciences, Osaka City University Sumiyoshi, Osaka 558-8585, JAPAN Norhayati Zakaria (norhayatizakaria@uowdubai.ac.ae) Faculty of Business and Management, University of Wollongong, Dubai 1-02, Block 15, Knowledge Village, Dubai, U.A.E. Abstract Nisbett et al. (2001) claim that Easterners are more likely to use holistic thinking to solve problems, whereas Westerners are more likely to use analytic thinking. This distinction in cognitive behaviors has often been explained by using a framework based on the fact that Western culture favors independent self-construal (individualist culture) and Eastern culture favors interdependent self-construal (collectivist culture). However, we propose another possible cultural explanation in the distinction between Western low context culture and Eastern high context culture (Hall, 1976). We particularly focus on the difference between the rule-based inference more common in low-context Western cultures and the dialectical inference more common in high-context Eastern cultures, and we argue that rule-based inference using global rules is more adaptive in low context cultures. Keywords: Culture; Psychology; Reasoning; Cross-cultural analysis. 1. Cultural Differences in Cognition Nisbett (2003; Nisbett, Peng, Choi, & Norenzayan, 2001) reviewed previous studies on cultural differences in cognition and described the differences in terms of a object and the field, and a preference for explaining and predicting events on the basis of such relationships. The distinction between analytic and holistic can be described in terms of four dimensions: context-dependent/ independent, dispositional/situational attribution, rule-based/ dialectical, and stable/changeable views. In terms of the third dimension (rule-based vs. dialectical), people from Western cultures are more inclined to employ rule-based thinking, whereas people from Eastern cultures are more apt to employ dialectical thinking (Buchtel & Norenzayan, 2008; Peng & Nisbett, 1999; Spencer-Rogers, Boucher, Mori, Wang, & Peng, 2009). For example, Norenzayan, Smith, Kim, and Nisbett (2002) reported that, when being asked which group an object should belong to (categorization task), Americans tended to focus on a single property (rule-based inference), whereas Koreans tended to respond based on family resemblance (intuitive inference). Peng and Nisbett (1999) proposed that the cognitive style of Chinese was dialectical, whereas the cognitive style of Americans was rule-based. 2. Nisbett’s Explanations for the Cultural Differences in Cognitio n distinction between analytic and holistic cognition. He argued that individuals from Western cultures are more likely to engage in analytic cognition, whereas individuals from Eastern cultures are more likely to engage in holistic cognition. According to his definition, analytic cognition involves detachment of the object from its context, a Nisbett et al. (2001) explained the distinction between Western analytic and Eastern holistic cognition by using the cultural value dimensions that underlines the individualist and collectivist cultures (Triandis, 1995). They discussed how each style is adaptive within its own cultural type. We tendency to focus on attributes of the object to assign it to a category, and a preference for using rules about the categories to explain and predict the object’s behavior. In contrast, holistic cognition is oriented towards context or the field as a whole, attention to relationships between a focal regard culture as a hypothetical construct to explain people’s behavior as well as to describe social patterns. In the long history of cultural studies, it has been claimed that Western societies have established individualist cultures, whereas Eastern societies have developed collectivist cultures
Linguistics,Psychology,Computer Science