Abstract:Background Beyond the observation that patients with low CFR indicating presence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) have an unfavourable prognosis compared to patients with preserved CFR, recent large multicentre trials [1-2] have shown that increased minimal hyperaemic microvascular resistance (HMR or IMR) ,neither on top of the low CFR nor alone, does not play a role as a prognostic factor for ischemia in nonobstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) patients. Purpose This study investigates the pathophysiological interactive processes in CMD and no-CMD groups with high and low HMR taking into account potential adaptive mechanisms that alter arterial reservoir function [3] associated with microvascular resistance and systemic vasomotor response in INOCA patients. Methods Analysis was conducted on 312 unique unobstructed vessels (FFR>0.80) from 258 patients (73% male) enrolled in the DEFINE-FLOW [4] study. CFR and HMR were quantified using intracoronary Doppler and pressure measurements. Vessels were categorized into four groups based on high and low CFR and HMR using the best available cut-off values (2.5 for both). Arterial reservoir capacity (ARC) and related parameters [3] were quantified using reservoir-excess pressure (Preservoir and Pexcess) analysis of averaged aortic and distal coronary pressure waveforms in CMD (CFR<2.5) and no-CMD (CFR≥2.5) subgroups. (Figure 1-2) Results Compared to vessels without CMD, functional and structural CMD have increased Pexcess (p:0.007) and a rapid decline in diastolic pressure (DRCcoronary p<0.001, DRCaortic, p<0.05), indicating the ongoing systemic hemodynamic superfluous state despite locally suppressed resting blood flow in the structural CMD. Higher baseline microvascular resistance (BMR) was associated with increased reservoir pressure (r:0.302, p<0.001). The vessels with preserved CFR despite high HMR are characterised by uniquely increased ARC (p:0.014), effectively diminished Pexcess (p:0.010), which parallels the local (highest BMR p<0.001) and global (lowest DRCaortic, p<0.05) vasomotor response, that normalizes the systemic and local hyperperfusion, and ultimately regains an adequate flow reserve (CFR) (p<0.001). The high HMR in this group was mainly due to increased resting tonus unlike structural CMD, evident by the highest RRR (BMR/HMR).(p<0.001) (Figure 1-2) Conclusion(s) The high HMR despite preserved CFR vessels form a unique-adaptive group, characterised by substantially increased arterial reservoir capacity and effectively diminished Pexcess, by means of an adaptive vasomotor response which manifests locally in the coronary bed as pronouncedly augmented BMR & RRR, and globally as reduced DRC in the aortic pressure waveform. This adaptive myogenic response normalising resting flow and ongoing systemic and local hyperperfusion ultimately regains an adequate flow reserve (CFR).Figure 1.Methods and Main FindingsFigure 2.Visual

Coronary microvascular dysfunction and future risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Heart Failure: Characterization of Patterns in HFrEF Versus HFpEF

Prevalence and correlates of coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PROMIS-HFpEF

Prognostic Significance of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Abstract 4138067: Prognostic Effect of Echocardiography-Assessed Coronary Flow Reserve in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Impact of coronary microvascular dysfunction on myocardial strain in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

The role of coronary microcirculation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: An unceasing odyssey

Clinical Relevance of Functionally Insignificant Moderate Coronary Artery Stenosis Assessed by 3‐vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement

Combined assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction can stratify prognosis of patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease

Coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure: observations from the MICRO registry

Clinical Implications of Three-Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Impact of coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a meta‐analysis

Prognostic Implications of Microvascular Resistance Reserve in Symptomatic Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis

Prognostic Impact of Diabetes Mellitus and Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization

Impaired Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients with Supra-Normal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction at Rest

High-Risk Morphological and Physiological Coronary Disease Attributes As Outcome Markers after Medical Treatment and Revascularization.

Moderately Increased Left Ventricular Filling Pressure Suggesting Early Stage of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients with Invasively Assessed Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction

High Resting Coronary Flow Velocity by Echocardiography Is Associated With Worse Survival in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndromes

Angio-based Coronary Functional Assessment Predicts 30-Day New-Onset Heart Failure after Acute Myocardial Infarction

The interplay between coronary microvascular resistance, arterial reservoir function and coronary flow reserve: unravelling the significance of high microvascular resistance

Microvascular Dysfunction in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Pathophysiology, Assessment, Prevalence and Prognosis