Abstract:Background Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a common sequelae of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), preventing adequate recovery of left ventricular (LV) perfusion. The interferences of con-commitment epicardial stenosis or hyperemic hemodynamic alterations limit traditional physiologic metrics. The microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) was developed to overcome these shortcomings. Purpose We aim to investigate the association between post-STEMI MRR, and the ensuing left ventricle (LV) diastolic dysfunction, and functional remodeling. Methods In this prospective, observational study, we enrolled STEMI patients with multivessel disease who successfully underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). At three months post-PCI, all patients received complete revascularization followed by coronary physiology assessment using the bolus thermodilution method to measure the fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). MRR was calculated using the formula: MRR = (CFR/FFR) × (Pa rest/Pa hyper), where Pa rest and Pa hyper represent resting and hyperemic aortic pressure, respectively(1). CMD was defined as an MRR < 3.0 based on Boerhout et al(2). Diastolic dysfunction was defined according to the ASE 2016 guidelines. Functional LV remodelling (FLVR) was categorized according to Chimed et al(3). The relationship between CMD and the stages of FLVR and diastolic dysfunction was scrutinized over a 12-month follow-up period. Results We enrolled 210 patients, of whom 125 (59.5%) were men with a median age of 65 (IQR: 58–76). At the 3-month follow-up, the MRR was 3.46 (IQR 3.00, 3.92), with 56 (26.7%) patients having CMD (MRR<3.0). MRR is significantly correlated with the change of LVEF between primary PCI and 12 months (r=0.48, p<0.001, Fig1A). CMD patients have lower LVEF at 12 months (50.00% vs. 40.00%; p < 0.001) and demonstrated significantly less recovery in LV systolic function (-10.00% vs. 8.00%; p < 0.001, Fig 1B, 1C). CMD patients had a higher prevalence of grade 2 or 3 LV diastolic dysfunction (65.38% vs. 3.95%; p < 0.001, Fig 2A) and a higher incidence of advanced FLVR (Groups 3 and 4) compared to those without CMD (30.77% vs. vs. 10.53%; p < 0.001, Fig 2B). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, MRR was independently associated with LV diastolic dysfunction (0.17, 95%CI 0.08-0.33, p<0.001). Conclusions The novel parameter MRR is significantly related to LVEF recovery in STEMI patients and is an independent predictor for advanced LV diastolic dysfunction and FLVR. CMD patients, as diagnosed with MRR, showed a higher prevalence of advanced FLVR and diastolic dysfunction. These results suggest that MRR is a useful parameter for the identification and management of CMD in STEMI patients.

Synergic interaction between coronary flow reserve and left atrial diameter as a risk factor for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease

Combined assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction can stratify prognosis of patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease

Effect of Microcirculatory Dysfunction on Coronary Hemodynamics: A Pilot Study Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation

Assessment of Right Atrial Function Measured with Cardiac MRI Feature Tracking for Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Prognostic Impact of Diabetes Mellitus and Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization

Clinical Relevance of Functionally Insignificant Moderate Coronary Artery Stenosis Assessed by 3‐vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement

Prognostic Impact of Cardiac Diastolic Function and Coronary Microvascular Function on Cardiovascular Death

Prognostic Implications of Microvascular Resistance Reserve in Symptomatic Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis

Myocardial contrast echocardiography evaluation of coronary microvascular dysfunction to Predict MACEs in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction follow-up

Abstract 4138067: Prognostic Effect of Echocardiography-Assessed Coronary Flow Reserve in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Impact of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction on Functional Left Ventricular Remodeling and Diastolic Dysfunction

Clinical Implications of Three-Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Impact of microvascular resistance reserve on post-STEMI cardiac remodelling and diastolic function

Impaired Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients with Supra-Normal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction at Rest

TDE-derived impaired post-PCI Coronary flow velocity reserve predicts MACE in patients who underwent LAD PCI

Factors Associated with Impaired Resistive Reserve Ratio and Microvascular Resistance Reserve

Relationship between left atrial/left ventricular diameter ratio and outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Increased circulating levels of malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction

Comparing left atrial indices by CMR in association with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and adverse clinical outcomes

Comparative prognostic importance of measures of left atrial structure and function in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Heart Failure: Characterization of Patterns in HFrEF Versus HFpEF