Coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure: observations from the MICRO registry

O Velollari,M Olschweski,K P Kresoja,J Herzog,M Brandt,K Schnitzler,M Knorr,P Wenzel,P Lurz,T Gori
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2358
IF: 39.3
2024-10-29
European Heart Journal
Abstract:Background Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of hospitalization in the elderly. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), among other risk factors, is linked to the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of HF. Purpose This abstract aims to summarize key findings from a comprehensive analysis of CMD in subgroups of HF, shedding light on its association with hemodynamic parameters. Methods Patients experiencing recurrent angina (CCS II-IV) and no relevant epicardial stenosis were enrolled in a prospective registry (MICRO). Epicardial and microvascular responses (pressure, resistance and flow) were assessed at rest and during adenosine and acetylcholine testing. The impact of an elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in the absence of clinical signs of HF was also investigated. Results Overall, 188 patients (63% (118) women, mean age 65±11 years) with angina and no epicardial stenosis were enrolled. Patients with HF (n=26) displayed lower hyperemic flow in response to endothelium-independent adenosine (5.2±3.1 vs. 7.3±4.4; P=0.004), lower coronary flow reserve (2.9±1.5 vs. 4.4±1.1; P<0.001) and microvascular resistance reserve (3.3±2.1 vs. 5.2±2.7; P<0.001), and increased microvascular resistance during adenosine-induced hyperemia (25±21 vs. 17±11; P=0.045). An increased LVEDP without clinical signs of HF was not associated with a lower coronary flow reserve (4.3±1.9 vs. 2.6±1.2; P=0.006) or microvascular resistance reserve (4.9±2.1 vs. 2.8±1.7; P=0.004). Microvascular resistance during acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent)-induced hyperemia was lower in HF patients (36.2±23.5 vs. 57.4±37.8; P=0.018). Conclusion(s) Patients with heart failure displayed signs of impaired microvascular endothelium-independent responses while endothelium-dependent reactivity appears to be maintained. An elevated LVEDP without clinical HF was not associated with impaired coronary microvascular function.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?