Abstract:Training in the design of animal experiments focuses all too often on those aspects which can be approached mathematically, such as the number of animals needed to deliver a robust result, allocation of group size, and techniques such as randomization, blocking and statistical analysis. Important as they are, these are only a small part of the process of planning animal experiments. Additional key elements include refinements of housing, husbandry and procedures, health and safety, and attention at all stages to animal welfare. Advances in technology and laboratory animal science have led to improvements in care and husbandry, better provision of anesthetics and analgesics, refined methods of drug administration, greater competence in welfare assessment and application of humane endpoints. These improvements require continual dialogue between scientists, facility managers and technical staff, a practice that is a key feature of what has become known as the culture of care. This embodies a commitment to improving animal welfare, scientific quality, staff care and transparency for all stakeholders. Attention to both the physical and mental health of all those directly or indirectly involved in animal research is now an important part of the process of planning and conducting animal experiments. Efforts during the last 30 years to increase the internal and external validity of animal experiments have tended to concentrate on the production of guidelines to improve the quality of reporting animal experiments, rather than for planning them. Recently, comprehensive guidelines for planning animal studies have been published, to redress this imbalance. These will be described in this paper. Endorsement of this overarching influence of the Three R concept, by all the stakeholders, will not only reduce animal numbers and improve animal welfare, but also lead to more reliable and reproducible research which should improve translation of pre-clinical studies into tangible clinical benefit.

How much confidence do we need in animal experiments? Statistical assumptions in sample size estimation

General considerations for sample size estimation in animal study

How to calculate sample size in animal and human studies

Statistics in Brief: The Importance of Sample Size in the Planning and Interpretation of Medical Research

Reporting and justification of sample size in translational chronic variable stress procedures: A systematic review

Determining sample size adequacy for animal model studies in nutrition research: limits and ethical challenges of ordinary power calculation procedures

Feasibility of Reducing Animal Numbers in Radiation Countermeasure Experiments from Historic Levels when using Sample Size Calculations

Considering aspects of the 3Rs principles within experimental animal biology

Sample Size Calculation in Clinical Trial and Animal Studies

Practical Sample Size Calculations for Surveillance and Diagnostic Investigations

Would you agree if N is three? On statistical inference for small N.

Sample Size for Pilot Studies and Precision Driven Experiments

Effect size, sample size and power of forced swim test assays in mice: Guidelines for investigators to optimize reproducibility

The importance of small samples in medical research

Sample Size Calculation: Inaccurate A Priori Assumptions for Nuisance Parameters Can Greatly Affect the Power of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Simulation methodologies to determine statistical power in laboratory animal research studies

Review of sample size determination methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in the one-way analysis of variance model

Sample Size Estimation in Veterinary Epidemiologic Research

The Role of the Three Rs in Improving the Planning and Reproducibility of Animal Experiments

Study design: think 'scientific value' not 'p-values'

Sample size calculation for data reliability and diagnostic performance: a go-to review