Abstract:Training in the design of animal experiments focuses all too often on those aspects which can be approached mathematically, such as the number of animals needed to deliver a robust result, allocation of group size, and techniques such as randomization, blocking and statistical analysis. Important as they are, these are only a small part of the process of planning animal experiments. Additional key elements include refinements of housing, husbandry and procedures, health and safety, and attention at all stages to animal welfare. Advances in technology and laboratory animal science have led to improvements in care and husbandry, better provision of anesthetics and analgesics, refined methods of drug administration, greater competence in welfare assessment and application of humane endpoints. These improvements require continual dialogue between scientists, facility managers and technical staff, a practice that is a key feature of what has become known as the culture of care. This embodies a commitment to improving animal welfare, scientific quality, staff care and transparency for all stakeholders. Attention to both the physical and mental health of all those directly or indirectly involved in animal research is now an important part of the process of planning and conducting animal experiments. Efforts during the last 30 years to increase the internal and external validity of animal experiments have tended to concentrate on the production of guidelines to improve the quality of reporting animal experiments, rather than for planning them. Recently, comprehensive guidelines for planning animal studies have been published, to redress this imbalance. These will be described in this paper. Endorsement of this overarching influence of the Three R concept, by all the stakeholders, will not only reduce animal numbers and improve animal welfare, but also lead to more reliable and reproducible research which should improve translation of pre-clinical studies into tangible clinical benefit.

The Role of the Three Rs in Improving the Planning and Reproducibility of Animal Experiments

Considering aspects of the 3Rs principles within experimental animal biology

Guidelines for planning and conducting high-quality research and testing on animals

The ‘R’ principles in laboratory animal experiments

It’s Time to Review the Three Rs, to Make them More Fit for Purpose in the 21st Century

3Rs missing: animal research without scientific value is unethical

Practical Aspects of Experimental Design in Animal Research

The Interpretation and Application of the Three Rs by Animal Ethics Committee Members

PREPARE: guidelines for planning animal research and testing

What Can Laboratory Animal Facility Managers Do to Improve the Welfare of Laboratory Animals and Laboratory Animal Facility Staff? A German Perspective

Experiences of early career researchers: Influences on the design and reporting of animal experiments, and the practical and emotional support needed to enhance best practice methods

General Principles, Designs, and Statistical Analyses in Experimental Animal Studies

Perceptions of 3R implementation in European animal research: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-synthesis of barriers and facilitators

Status assessment and opportunities for improving fish welfare in animal experimental research according to the 3R-Guidelines

Internal consistency and compatibility of the 3Rs and 3Vs principles for project evaluation of animal research

The Usefulness of Systematic Reviews of Animal Experiments for the Design of Preclinical and Clinical Studies

Animals, quality and the pursuit of relevance

What is the optimum design for my animal experiment?

Science, Culture, and Care in Laboratory Animal Research

Impact of quality and transparency in scientific writing on the reduction of animal usage in experimental protocols: a review based in pertinent literature

Study design: think 'scientific value' not 'p-values'