Abstract:Introduction Although atrial septal pacing has been reported to reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, there is less evidence regarding its effect on the prevention of permanent AF and the improvement of long-term clinical outcomes. However, Bachmann's bundle pacing (BBp), which features P-wave morphology similar to sinus rhythm and shortened P-wave duration (PWD), was reported to significantly reduce permanent AF recurrences and occurrences compared with right atrial appendage pacing (RAAp) and non-specific right septal pacing. Purpose Possible mechanisms for AF suppression with BBp are that fast inter-atrial conduction through BB decreases global atrial activation time and the dispersion of the overall atrial refractoriness, and it prevents the decrease in left ventricular filling and increase in left atrial pressure associated with delayed left atrial contraction. Intra-and inter-atrial conduction during BBp was evaluated using longitudinal bi-atrial strain. Methods In patients with successful BBp implantation defined by electrocardiographic criteria using SelectSecure pacing lead and C315 delivery catheter (Medtronic, Inc), both left atrium (LA) and right atrium (RA) global longitudinal strain (GLS) in simultaneous phases were measured using Philips Ultrasound Workspace 2D Strain in apical 4-chamber view during atrial pacing to assess intra- and inter-atrial conduction delay. The atrial GLS were measured semi-automatically, and the strain rate was analyzed in the three segments of septal wall, lateral wall, and roof and their average. The negative peak of strain rate during atrial systole was the starting point of atrial contraction, and time to peak (TTP) was measured. The difference in TTP between septal and lateral walls in each atrium was measured as intra-atrial conduction delay and the difference in average TTP between LA and RA as inter-atrial conduction delay. Results Ten patients who underwent successful BBp were enrolled (Sick sinus syndrome: 3, advanced atrioventricular block: 2, complete atrioventricular block: 5). At implantation, bipolar atrial electrogram amplitude was 2.03±0.93 mV, atrial lead impedance was 632.7±157.6 Ω, and atrial pacing threshold was 0.7±0.2 V at 0.4 ms. The PWD during sinus rhythm on the 12-lead ECG was 132.8±10.6 ms, while during BBp it was 108.0±11.9 ms, which was significantly shorter in the BBp group (p<0.001). The intra-atrial conduction delay in RA and LA was 10.9 ± 12.1 ms and 12.1 ± 17.3 ms, respectively, and the inter-atrial conduction delay was 6.6 ± 8.6 ms. On the other hand, for the 10 RAAp and 10 sinus rhythm patients as control groups, the inter-atrial conduction delay was 29.7±13.8 ms and 8.5±9.5 ms, respectively. BBp had significantly less inter-atrial conduction delay than RAAp (p=0.005) and was comparable to sinus rhythm (p=0.719). Conclusion Longitudinal bi-atrial strain suggested that BBp significantly reduced inter-atrial delay and it might be effective in AF suppression.Longitudinal bi-atrial strain

Bachmann bundle pacing reduces atrial electromechanical delay in type 1 myotonic dystrophy patients

Electrical Synchrony Optimization for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Bradycardia and Heart Failure.

Comparison Of Synchronization Between Left Bundle Branch And His Bundle Pacing In Atrial Fibrillation Patients: An Intra-Patient-Controlled Study

Verification of intra- and inter-atrial conduction during Bachmann's bundle pacing using longitudinal bi-atrial strain

Clinical evaluation of pacemaker automatic capture management and atrioventricular interval extension algorithm.

Effect of pacing site on P wave parameters: Within-patient comparison of right atrial appendage and Bachmann's bundle

Effects of right atrial and ventricular DDD pacing on cardiac function and ventricular contraction synchrony

Comparison between left bundle branch area pacing and right ventricular pacing: ventricular electromechanical synchrony and risk of atrial high-rate episodes

Electrogram-guided Bachmann bundle area pacing to correct interatrial block: Initial experience, safety, and feasibility

Reduction of Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing by Managed Ventricular Pacing and Search AV+ Algorithms in Pacemaker Patients: 12-Month Follow-Up Results of a Randomized Study.

Atrial Dysfunction and Interatrial Dyssynchrony Predict Atrial High Rate Episodes: Insight into the Distinct Effects of Right Atrial Appendage Pacing

Use of Acoustic Cardiography to Assess Left Ventricular Electromechanical Synchronization During Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Improvement of myocardial contractility with leadless endocardial single-lead atrial sensing ventricular pacing in patients with prolonged PQ interval

Difference in prevalence and pattern of mechanical dyssynchrony in left bundle branch block occurring in right ventricular apical pacing versus systolic heart failure.

[Long-Term Effect of Different Right Ventricular Apex Pacing Ratio on Heart Structure and Function of Patients with Dual Chamber Pacemaker].

Assessment of ventricular mechanics by means of myocardial work in patients undergoing physiologic versus right ventricular apical stimulation:a prospective study

Evaluation of differences in left ve ntricular myocardial mechanical patterns between right ventricular pacing sites and atr oiventricular sequential pa cing using ultrasonic tissue tracking imaging

Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison with Biventricular Pacing.

Differences in Electrical Delay Between the Mid-septum and Apex with the Right Ventricular Lead: Novel Implications for Pacemaker Sensing

Interatrial Septal Pacing to Suppress Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Dual Chamber Pacemakers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials

Hemodynamic importance of preserving the normal sequence of ventricular activation in permanent cardiac pacing