Abstract:Problem definition: Firms heavily invest in big data technologies to collect consumer data and infer consumer preferences for price discrimination. However, consumers can use technological devices to manipulate their data and fool firms to obtain better deals. We examine how a firm invests in collecting consumer data and makes pricing decisions and whether it should disclose its scope of data collection to consumers who can manipulate their data. Methodology/results: We develop a game-theoretic model to consider a market in which a firm caters to consumers with heterogeneous preferences for a product. The firm collects consumer data to identify their types and issue an individualized price, whereas consumers can incur a cost to manipulate data and mimic the other type. We find that when the firm does not disclose its scope of data collection to consumers, it collects more consumer data. When the firm discloses its scope of data collection, it reduces data collection even when collecting more data is costless. The optimal scope of data collection increases when it is more costly for consumers to manipulate data but decreases when consumer demand becomes more heterogeneous. Moreover, a lower cost for consumers to manipulate data can be detrimental to both the firm and consumers. Lastly, disclosure of data collection scope increases firm profit, consumer surplus, and social welfare. Managerial implications: Our findings suggest that a firm should adjust its scope of data collection and prices based on whether the firm discloses the data collection scope, consumers’ manipulation cost, and demand heterogeneity. Public policies should require firms to disclose their data collection scope to increase consumer surplus and social welfare. Even without such a mandatory disclosure policy, firms should voluntarily disclose their data collection scope to increase profit. Moreover, public educational programs that train consumers to manipulate their data or raise their awareness of manipulation tools can ultimately hurt consumers and firms.

Online Privacy and Information Disclosure by Consumers

Voluntary Disclosure and Personalized Pricing

Pricing and disseminating customer data with privacy awareness

Information Disclosure under Competition in Sharing Systems

Price Increases from Online Privacy

Information Disclosure Game on Sharing Platforms

Privacy Risk is a Function of Information Type: Learnings for the Surveillance Capitalism Age.

Endogenous Information Acquisition and Disclosure of Private Information in a Duopoly

Consumer Privacy in Oligopolistic Markets: Winners, Losers, and Welfare

Who Wants Consumers to Be Informed? Facilitating Information Disclosure in a Distribution Channel

Antecedents of Consumers’ Privacy Protection Behavior and Intention to Disclose Personal Information: Mediating Role of Personal Information Transparency

Data Provision to an Informed Seller

Data Trade and Consumer Privacy

The Effects of Personal Data Management on Competition and Welfare

The Strange Case of Privacy in Equilibrium Models

Social Information Disclosure of Friends in Common in an E‐commerce Platform Ecosystem: an Online Experiment

Information disclosure and price discovery

Inducing Consumer Online Reviews Via Disclosure

Personal data disclosure and data breaches: the customer's viewpoint

Privacy Can Arise Endogenously in an Economic System with Learning Agents

Beating the Algorithm: Consumer Manipulation, Personalized Pricing, and Big Data Management