Abstract:General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—the European Union’s data protection regulation—has two key principles. It recognizes that individuals own and control their personal (but not contractual) data in perpetuity, leading to three critical privacy rights, namely, the rights to (i) explicit consent (data opt-in), (ii) to be forgotten (data erasure), and (iii) portability (data transfer). It also includes data security mandates against privacy breaches through unauthorized access. We study GDPR’s equilibrium impact by including these features in a dynamic two-period model of forward-looking firms and consumers. Firms collect consumer data for personalization and price discrimination. Consumers trade off gains from personalization relative to potential losses from privacy breaches and price discrimination in their purchase, data opt-in, erasure, and transfer decisions. Though data security mandates impose fines on firms for privacy breaches, firms can benefit from higher opt-in given lower breach risk. Surprisingly, data security mandates can hurt consumers. The effect of privacy rights is nuanced. Since the right to opt in separates goods exchange from the provision of personal data, it prevents market failure under high breach risk. But it also reduces consumer opt-in and personal data availability. Erasure and portability rights reduce consumers’ hold-up concerns by disciplining firms to provide ongoing value by limiting price discrimination and not slacking off on data security; but they also reduce the incentive to offer lower initial prices that encourages opt-in. Overall, privacy rights always benefit consumers in competitive markets, but they can surprisingly hurt consumers under monopoly, as monopolists have less incentives to subsidize consumer opt-in. They raise (reduce) firm profit and social welfare when breach risk is high (low). Finally, privacy rights increase firm profit most at moderate levels of data transferability. This paper was accepted by Dmitri Kuksov, marketing. Funding: T. T. Ke acknowledges financial support from the General Research Fund of the Hong Kong Research Grants Council [Grant 14500421]. Supplemental Material: The e-companion is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4614 .

Consumer Privacy in Oligopolistic Markets: Winners, Losers, and Welfare

Privacy Risks of Social Interaction Structure: Network Learning in Quadratic Games

Privacy and Personal Data Collection with Information Externalities

Consumer Privacy Concerns, Multihoming, and Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets

Privacy Rights and Data Security: GDPR and Personal Data Markets

The Strange Case of Privacy in Equilibrium Models

Online Privacy and Information Disclosure by Consumers

The Effects of Personal Data Management on Competition and Welfare

Consumer privacy and serial monopoly

Privacy Risk is a Function of Information Type: Learnings for the Surveillance Capitalism Age.

Robust Regulation of Firms' Access to Consumer Data

Data, Competition, and Digital Platforms

Law, Economics, and Privacy: Implications of Government Policies on Website and Third-Party Information Sharing

Data Privacy and Algorithmic Inequality

The Economics of Privacy

Privacy Rights in Online Interactions and Litigation Dynamics: A Social Custom View

Consumers' Perceived Privacy Violations in Online Advertising

Privacy, Practice, and Performance

Privacy regulations and economic efficiency: a dynamic perspective

Regulating Oligopolistic Competition