Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to make a comparative study on the latest version of green campus evaluation standard between China and America: Green Campus Evaluation Standard (GB/T51356-2019) and the sustainability tracking, assessment and rating system (STARS 2.2). The differences of evaluation methods and contents are analyzed and their respective characteristics and advantages are sorted out, so as to promote the development of sustainable campus evaluation standards. Design/methodology/approach The research mainly adopts the method of comparative study, which is carried out from three dimensions, namely, the related policies development of campus construction and world university sustainable rankings; the content of evaluation standards (including evaluation methods and evaluation categories and scores); the characteristics and current application of standards. Findings There are great differences between the evaluation standards of China and America in organization and participation mode, evaluation method and content. Public engagement, energy and campus engagement are the hot spots. Buildings, energy, food and dining and investment and finance will become the focus of sustainable campus in the future. Specific optimization strategies of key points, evaluation method and content and organization and participation mode of Chinese standard are put forward. Practical implications This paper clarifies the advantages and disadvantages of the current global sustainable campus, and provides the basis for the next stage of construction policy. At the same time, it is helpful for all countries, especially China, to formulate construction guidelines that not only meet their own actual needs but also conform to the trend of global sustainable campus development. Social implications The connotation of sustainable campus is enriched, and the evaluation standards of sustainable campus are improved. The development of sustainable campus is promoted, so as to realize the sustainable development goals. Originality/value This research expands the scope of the study to the whole campus, rather than just one aspect of campus buildings. It compares the evaluation standard of green campus in China with STARS in the USA, and no longer compares leadership in energy and environmental design for schools. It discusses the campus building’s energy conservation while paying attention to the campus green consciousness, green management and green planning. Based on the relevant data currently used by STARS in the global evaluation, this paper analyzes the hot spots and shortcomings of the current global sustainable campus construction and puts forward some optimization suggestions for China’s green campus evaluation system.

Comparison of Standards for Accessible Design between America and China

Comparison of Construction Standards' Content and Depth Between China and Canada and Its Reference

Evaluate Accessibility and Usability Issues of Particular China and Pakistan Government Websites

From Green to Healthy Buildings: A Comparative Study of the USA and China

Age-Friendly Transportation Policies and Practices in the U.S. and China: A Comparative Study

A comparison on the evaluation standards of sustainable campus between China and America

An Overview of Web Accessibility Evaluation of Government Websites in China

The Differences in Education between China and the Western World and English Teaching and Learning Reform in Colleges

A Thorough Assessment of China’s Standard for Energy Consumption of Buildings

From Physical Environment Accessibility to Information Accessibility: Survey and Analysis of Problem and Countermeasure of Public Library Services to the Disabled in China

Evaluation of web accessibility in China: changes from 2009 to 2013

Investigation on the Implementation of Barrier-free Regulations in Beijing

A comparative analysis of green building rating systems in China and the United States

Standard System Comparison of Government Investment Projects among China, the United States and Canada

Development Strategies of Construction Standards in Government Investment Projects

A Comparative Analysis of Architectural Programming Education between China and United States

A Comparative Study on Technical Standards for the Design of Emergency Medical Facilities in China in the Context of COVID-19

Review on spatial accessibility and equity of public facilities

Comparison of Early Childhood Education Programs between Eastern and Western Countries

A Community-Oriented Accessibility Index of Public Health Service Facilities: A Case Study of Wuchang District, Wuhan, China

Improving the Understanding of the Green Assessment System / LEED in Developing Countries : the Case of China