Abstract:Abstract Industrial design (ID) undergraduate education in China is seen as a new rapidly growing discipline over the past 40 years. China’s ID education is not well known in the West due to several barriers: language, the Great Firewall of China which blocks out most of the Western websites and a 12-h time difference. All Chinese ID curriculum and program information are available in Mandarin. The Ministry of Education administers all Chinese design education as well as ID scholarships and faculty exchange grants and its website and documents require translation. The Great Firewall of China blocks 90% of Western websites including Google making it difficult for Western Scholars to access accurate information about the size and shape of the Chinese ID education landscape. China has a historical relationship between the ID schools in China and the United States. Chinese students are studying or alumni of every American ID program. China and USA share similar program types, dual-track admissions for art and design streams, and academic calendars. In this paper, a model was developed to clarify the features of ID undergraduate education in China and USA, and a survey of eight ID schools was processed. Four aspects were comparatively discussed: (1) types of ID education, (2) ranking, evaluation, and certification of ID schools and programs, (3) curriculum, credits, course features, and yearly schedules of schools, (4) influences coming from the culture and globalization process. Based on the analysis, the similarities and differences in ID undergraduate education between the two countries are discussed. Results show the dual-track modes in China and USA are different. It is mainly reflected in the management and enrollment, curriculum organization, and cultural environment. Implications for the localization, openness, and globalization to ID education are finally discussed together with several directions for future development. The findings are valuable to USA and Chinese ID departments and faculty, researchers, staff and visiting scholars. It is also useful for university administrative units such as registrars, admissions, international offices and exchanges to understand each other.

A Comparative Analysis of Architectural Programming Education between China and United States

The Organization of Planning Education System in the USA:Lessons to the Planning Education in China

Operation System of Architectural Programming:Realization from the Theory to the Practice

A Comparative Analysis of Electronic Information Specialty in Universities of Germany and Those of China

Study on the Evolution of Architectural Programming Tools in the U.S.

Exploration and Practice of Joint-teaching-workshop Between China and Foreign Countries

A Brief Analysis of the Role of Architectural Aesthetics in Chinese Architectural Education from the Perspective of Mental Health

DEPTH OR BREADTH: CONSIDERATION OF KNOWLEDGE COVERAGE OF UNDERGRADU-ATE EDUCATION IN URBAN PLANNING

Investigation on Contemporary Chinese Architectural Education

Architecture in Transformation: A Rethinking on Architectural Programming and Architecture

Summary of Modern Architectural Planning with the View of the Globalization

Comparison and Strategies of Architectural Education under System Diversification

A PRIMARY STUDY ON THE ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION OF INTERNATIONAL ARCHITECTURAL SCHOOLS:ON THE CASES OF CAMBRIDGE,HARVARD,MIT AND ROME UNIVERSITY

Consideration of Domestic Development of Architecture Programming Work

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON DESIGN/BUILD COURSES

Study on the Proportion of Technical Courses in Chinese Architectural Education Since the Mid-19th Century

Comparative analysis of industrial design education between China and western countries

Return to the origin of the Architecture:Rethinking Architectural Education in China

Comparative study of industrial design undergraduate education in China and USA

Comparison of Standards for Accessible Design between America and China

Arch.Ed.