Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to make a comparative study on the latest version of green campus evaluation standard between China and America: Green Campus Evaluation Standard (GB/T51356-2019) and the sustainability tracking, assessment and rating system (STARS 2.2). The differences of evaluation methods and contents are analyzed and their respective characteristics and advantages are sorted out, so as to promote the development of sustainable campus evaluation standards. Design/methodology/approach The research mainly adopts the method of comparative study, which is carried out from three dimensions, namely, the related policies development of campus construction and world university sustainable rankings; the content of evaluation standards (including evaluation methods and evaluation categories and scores); the characteristics and current application of standards. Findings There are great differences between the evaluation standards of China and America in organization and participation mode, evaluation method and content. Public engagement, energy and campus engagement are the hot spots. Buildings, energy, food and dining and investment and finance will become the focus of sustainable campus in the future. Specific optimization strategies of key points, evaluation method and content and organization and participation mode of Chinese standard are put forward. Practical implications This paper clarifies the advantages and disadvantages of the current global sustainable campus, and provides the basis for the next stage of construction policy. At the same time, it is helpful for all countries, especially China, to formulate construction guidelines that not only meet their own actual needs but also conform to the trend of global sustainable campus development. Social implications The connotation of sustainable campus is enriched, and the evaluation standards of sustainable campus are improved. The development of sustainable campus is promoted, so as to realize the sustainable development goals. Originality/value This research expands the scope of the study to the whole campus, rather than just one aspect of campus buildings. It compares the evaluation standard of green campus in China with STARS in the USA, and no longer compares leadership in energy and environmental design for schools. It discusses the campus building’s energy conservation while paying attention to the campus green consciousness, green management and green planning. Based on the relevant data currently used by STARS in the global evaluation, this paper analyzes the hot spots and shortcomings of the current global sustainable campus construction and puts forward some optimization suggestions for China’s green campus evaluation system.

From Green to Healthy Buildings: A Comparative Study of the USA and China

A comparative analysis of green building rating systems in China and the United States

A COMPARISON OF INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL SATISFACTION BETWEEN TWO GREEN BUILDINGS AND A CONVENTIONAL BUILDING IN CHINA

An Overview of Chinese Green Building Standards

A Thorough Assessment of China’s Standard for Energy Consumption of Buildings

A COMPARISON STUDY OF THE GREEN BUILDING EVALUATION CRITERIA IN ASIA

Improving the Understanding of the Green Assessment System / LEED in Developing Countries : the Case of China

A comparison on the evaluation standards of sustainable campus between China and America

A Comparative Study on Architectural Design-Related Requirements of Green Building Rating Systems for New Buildings

Comparison of Standards for Accessible Design between America and China

Study of Several Factors for Green Building Assessment System in China

Some Key Issues about Building Environmental Performance Assessment System

Comparison of building energy use data between the United States and China

A comparative study of gender differences in healthy office building strategies

Comparative Study on the Indoor Environment Quality of Green Office Buildings in China with A Long-Term Field Measurement and Investigation

Research on the Assessment System of Green Buildings in China

An Overview of the Green Building Performance Database

A Holistic Approach to Evaluate Building Performance Gap of Green Office Buildings: A Case Study in China

Indoor environmental quality in WELL-certified and LEED-certified buildings

INTERPRETATION AND PRACTICEANALYSIS OF "AIR" CHAPTER OF ASSESSMENT STANDARD FOR HEALTHY BUILDING

Comparative study of greenhouse gas emission calculations and the environmental impact in the life cycle assessment of buildings in China, Finland, and the United States