Abstract:Abstract A prerequisite for low‐stakes activities to improve learning is to keep students engaged when confronted with challenging material. Comparing a personalized and non‐personalized version of computerized practising, this study experimentally evaluates the relationships between student effort and ability across different dimensions of task perceptions. Students practise longer when the task is perceived to be not too difficult. Students assigned to a personalized version of the tool have a lower success rate while practising, but this does not translate to differences in practice intensity, task perceptions, or summative test scores. In a personalized practising environment, perceived interest and usefulness both have the potential to promote engagement, albeit in different ways. Students with a lower level of subject‐specific ability find the tool more interesting and, particularly, consider the non‐personalized tool difficult but useful. Instead, in the personalized condition, it is the group of students with higher prescores who value the tool as relatively useful. These results indicate that more students will remain engaged with adaptive practising if software takes into account such differences. Multiple approaches and algorithms may thus be necessary to optimally adapt practising to individual learners.Lay Description What is already known about this topic: A prerequisite for low‐stakes activities to improve learning is to keep students engaged when confronted with challenging material. Educators are generally optimistic that adaptive software in education has the potential to boost student learning outcomes. Obvious challenges remain in keeping school‐aged adolescents engaged throughout the learning process with digital learning tools used in low‐stakes settings. What this paper adds: Task perceptions regarding low‐stakes practising relate empirically to differential patterns of student engagement and performance for students of different ability. The impact of personalization on task perceptions evolves over time as students acquire more experience with the learning tool. Perceived interest and usefulness of working with digital learning tools both have the potential to promote engagement, albeit in different ways and only for students working in a personalized environment. High‐ability students assign higher usefulness to adaptive practising, which, relative to nonadaptive practising, is relatively difficult and lowers the success rate. Implications for practice and/or policy: When adaptive practising is implemented as a relatively low‐stakes activity, perceived usefulness is important in safeguarding student effort. More students will remain engaged with practising if adaptive software takes into account student differences (e.g., ability) and preferences (e.g., test preparation). Effective computerized personalized practising asks for a more comprehensive approach as to promote engagement of all students.

Student engagement with computerized practising: Ability, task value, and difficulty perceptions

Does Difficulty even Matter? Investigating Difficulty Adjustment and Practice Behavior in an Open-Ended Learning Task

Using adaptive learning technologies to personalize instruction to student interests: The impact of relevant contexts on performance and learning outcomes.

Getting too personal(ized): The importance of feature choice in online adaptive algorithms

The role of situational interest in personalized learning.

Differences in personalized learning practice and technology use in high- and low-performing learner-centered schools in the United States

On the Development of a Computer-Based Tool for Formative Student Assessment: Epistemological, Methodological, and Practical Issues

Selecting learning tasks: Effects of adaptation and shared control on learning efficiency and task involvement

[Prospective randomized multicenter phase III study of non-seminomatous testicular tumors of clinical stage II A/B].

Personalized gamification versus one-size-fits-all gamification in fully online learning: Effects on student motivational, behavioral and cognitive outcomes

Engaging children with cerebral palsy in interactive computer play-based motor therapies: theoretical perspectives

Personalized strategies for academic success in learning anatomy: Exploring metacognitive and technological adaptation in medical students

A Model for Effective Learning in Competition: A Pedagogical Tool to Enhance Enjoyment and Perceptions of Competency in Physical Education Lessons for Young Children

Predictors of Accessibility Tool Use on a Low-Stakes Computer-Based Math Test

Leveraging performance and feedback-seeking indicators from a digital learning platform for early prediction of students' learning outcomes

Personalizing real‐world problems: Posing own problems increases self‐efficacy expectations, intrinsic value, attainment value, and utility value

Quantifying deliberate practice using auto‐graded questions: Analyzing multiple metrics in a chemical engineering course

The Effects of Personalized Nudges on Cognitively Disengaged Student Behavior in Low-Stakes Assessments

Contextualization, Authenticity, and the Problem Description Effect

What influences student situational engagement in smart classrooms: Perception of the learning environment and students' motivation

The Dynamics of Learning Engagement in Challenge-Based Online Learning