Abstract:Abstract A prerequisite for low‐stakes activities to improve learning is to keep students engaged when confronted with challenging material. Comparing a personalized and non‐personalized version of computerized practising, this study experimentally evaluates the relationships between student effort and ability across different dimensions of task perceptions. Students practise longer when the task is perceived to be not too difficult. Students assigned to a personalized version of the tool have a lower success rate while practising, but this does not translate to differences in practice intensity, task perceptions, or summative test scores. In a personalized practising environment, perceived interest and usefulness both have the potential to promote engagement, albeit in different ways. Students with a lower level of subject‐specific ability find the tool more interesting and, particularly, consider the non‐personalized tool difficult but useful. Instead, in the personalized condition, it is the group of students with higher prescores who value the tool as relatively useful. These results indicate that more students will remain engaged with adaptive practising if software takes into account such differences. Multiple approaches and algorithms may thus be necessary to optimally adapt practising to individual learners.Lay Description What is already known about this topic: A prerequisite for low‐stakes activities to improve learning is to keep students engaged when confronted with challenging material. Educators are generally optimistic that adaptive software in education has the potential to boost student learning outcomes. Obvious challenges remain in keeping school‐aged adolescents engaged throughout the learning process with digital learning tools used in low‐stakes settings. What this paper adds: Task perceptions regarding low‐stakes practising relate empirically to differential patterns of student engagement and performance for students of different ability. The impact of personalization on task perceptions evolves over time as students acquire more experience with the learning tool. Perceived interest and usefulness of working with digital learning tools both have the potential to promote engagement, albeit in different ways and only for students working in a personalized environment. High‐ability students assign higher usefulness to adaptive practising, which, relative to nonadaptive practising, is relatively difficult and lowers the success rate. Implications for practice and/or policy: When adaptive practising is implemented as a relatively low‐stakes activity, perceived usefulness is important in safeguarding student effort. More students will remain engaged with practising if adaptive software takes into account student differences (e.g., ability) and preferences (e.g., test preparation). Effective computerized personalized practising asks for a more comprehensive approach as to promote engagement of all students.

Selecting learning tasks: Effects of adaptation and shared control on learning efficiency and task involvement

Measuring Adaptive Control in Conflict Tasks

To choose or not to choose? Effects of choice in authentic context-based learning environments

Effects of adaptive scaffolding on performance, cognitive load and engagement in game-based learning: a randomized controlled trial

Not all choices are created equal: Task-relevant choices enhance motor learning compared to task-irrelevant choices

Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking

The benefit of choice on task performance: Reduced difficulty effects in free-choice versus forced-choice tasks

Student engagement with computerized practising: Ability, task value, and difficulty perceptions

Beyond stimulus–response rules: Task sets incorporate information about performance difficulty.

Mastery-Oriented Shared Student/System Control Over Problem Selection in a Linear Equation Tutor

Reinforcement learning of adaptive control strategies

EXPRESS: From task-general towards task-specific cognitive operations in a few minutes? Working memory performance as an adaptive process

The Temporal Dynamics of Metacognitive Experiences Track Rational Adaptations in Task Performance

Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: The involvement load hypothesis on trial

Trainee selection of tasks in postgraduate medical education: Is there a role for 'cherry-picking' to optimise learning?

Timing and relevance of secondary tasks impact multitasking performance

Enhancing learning experiences: EEG-based passive BCI system adapts learning speed to cognitive load in real-time, with motivation as catalyst

How do task characteristics affect learning and performance? The roles of simultaneous, interactive, and continuous tasks

Interaction between self-efficacy and initial performance in predicting the complexity of task chosen

High User Control in Game Design Elements Increases Compliance and In-game Performance in a Memory Training Game

Self-controlled amount and pacing of practice facilitate learning of a sequential timing task