Effects of External Pacing Type on the Cross-Education of Motor Skill
Justin W. Andrushko Dakota T. Zirk Aryan R. Kurniawan Doug W. Renshaw Jonathan P. Farthing 1 College of Kinesiology,University of Saskatchewan,Saskatoon,Canada.2 Department of Sport,Exercise and Rehabilitation,Faculty of Health and Life Sciences,Northumbria University,Newcastle upon Tyne,UK.3 Department of Psychology,College of Arts and Science,University of Saskatchewan,Saskatoon,Canada.4 Department of Kinesiology and Human Performance,Sul Ross State University,Alpine,Texas,USA.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2024.2390032
2024-08-20
Journal of Motor Behavior
Abstract:Cross-education (CE) is a phenomenon whereby motor training of one limb leads to improved performance in the opposite untrained limb. External pacing of a motor task can enhance CE; however, the influence of different pacing methods is poorly understood. This study explored how motor training with auditory (AP) and visual pacing (VP) impacts CE with a visuomotor force target task. Sixty-one participants performed a unimanual motor task. Participants were randomized into a visual ( n = 31) or auditory ( n = 30) pacing stimuli condition. The primary outcome was cumulative error scores for each hand, before and after visuomotor training. Pacing type did not yield different magnitudes of CE. However, after adjusting for baseline differences, a significant hand (trained vs. untrained) × practice side (dominant or non-dominant) interaction ( p = .013, η p 2 = .106) and a group main effect ( p = .036, η p 2 = .165) were observed. Visual pacing resulted in greater improvements in task performance compared to auditory pacing regardless of hand or practice side, while training the dominant limb resulting in a greater interlimb asymmetry regardless of pacing stimulus. These findings have implications for applying pacing strategies during rehabilitation from unilateral injury or neurological impairment.
psychology, experimental,neurosciences,sport sciences