Abstract:Conflict adaptation is an important phenomenon, as the interference effect on the current trials is reduced following incongruent versus congruent trials. Moreover, conflict adaptation effect (CAE) is thought to measure adaptive control on a trial-by-trial basis. There are two main theories explaining the mechanisms underlying CAE: conflict monitoring theory and adaptation by binding theory. However, both theories have not explicitly proposed a clear relationship between conflict strength and cognitive control adjustment. Previous studies have mostly focused on the type of conflict that triggers CAE, which reflected qualitative analysis. Hence, it remains unclear whether changes in the level of conflict of the same conflict type affect conflict adaptation. To address the above issue, the present study recruited 31 healthy participants with a mean age of 19.74 years to perform the variant of the letter flanker task without feature repetitions. Each stimulus was composed of "F/H/N/P" letter components and arranged in a way that a central target letter was flanked by symmetric arrays of two distracter letters. Experiment manipulated the level of conflict by parametrically varying the target-distracter compatibility. Flankers were 100% compatible with the central target for no-conflict condition (e.g., NNNNN), 50% for low-conflict condition (e.g., HNNNH), and 0% for high-conflict condition (e.g., HHNHH). Congruent stimuli were presented on 50% of trials with each incongruent condition occurring equally often on the remaining 50% of trials. Results showed that reaction times (RTs) increased with the number of incompatible flankers, suggesting a correlation with the level of conflict. Moreover, the interaction between previous trial congruency (no-conflict/low-conflict/high-conflict) and current trial congruency (no-conflict/low-conflict/high-conflict) was significant, which suggested that congruency of previous trials affected the interference effect of current trials. Follow-up analyses revealed that there were classic conflict adaptation phenomena between no-conflict and low-conflict, no-conflict and high-conflict, and low-conflict and high-conflict conditions. These results showed that conflict adaptation was also triggered by the level of conflict in addition to the occurrence of the conflict. Overall, the present study demonstrated that the conflict strength of previous trials was related to the cognitive control level of current trials, showing that larger conflict led to stronger cognitive control adjustment. In addition, the function of conflict-induced cognitive control may be realized by attentional focusing. In conclusion, the present study emphasizes that changes in the level of conflict could trigger conflict adaptation, which provides more direct support for attention adjustment mechanism of conflict monitoring theory. Combining existing researches, we infer that conflict monitoring is sensitive to the type and level of conflict, and adjusts the level of cognitive control to facilitate conflict resolution.

Measuring Adaptive Control in Conflict Tasks

Adaptation in conflict: are conflict-triggered control adjustments protected in the presence of motivational distractors?

Nature and measurement of attention control.

Temporal Dynamics of Conflict Adaptation Across Different Conflict Strengths.

The neural dynamics of conflict adaptation induced by conflict observation: Evidence from univariate and multivariate analysis

Changes in the level of conflict trigger conflict adaptation

Distractor-specific control adaptation in multidimensional environments

Can the Stroop effect serve as the gold standard of conflict monitoring and control? A conceptual critique

The Conflict Adaptation Effect is Based on Specific-Domain

Cognitive control adjustments are dependent on the level of conflict

Mechanisms underlying flexible adaptation of cognitive control: behavioral and neuroimaging evidence in a flanker task

Reinforcement learning of adaptive control strategies

Advancing the understanding of individual differences in attentional control: Theoretical, methodological, and analytical considerations

Normal congruency sequence effects in psychopathology: A behavioral and electrophysiological examination using a confound-minimized design

Observation of conflict triggers conflict adaptation.

Cognitive adaptation and its consequences: a test of cognitive continuum theory

Evaluative conditioning of conflict aversiveness and its effects on adaptive control

Attention Control: A Cornerstone of Higher-Order Cognition

Tracing conflict-induced cognitive-control adjustments over time using aperiodic EEG activity

When conflict cannot be avoided: executive control dominates early selective sensory modulations during cognitive conflict

Modality matters: Three auditory conflict tasks to measure individual differences in attention control