Abstract:BackgroundThe GTAP model has been used to estimate biofuel policy induced land use changes and consequent GHG emissions for more than a decade. This paper reviews the history of the model and database modifications and improvements that have occurred over that period. In particular, the paper covers in greater detail the move from the 2004 to the 2011 database, and the inclusion of cropland intensification in the modeling structure.ResultsThe results show that all the changes in the global economy and agricultural sectors cause biofuels induced land use changes and associated emissions can be quite different using the 2011 database versus 2004. The results also demonstrate the importance of including land intensification in the analysis. The previous versions of GTAP and other similar models assumed that changes in harvested area equal changes in cropland area. However, FAO data demonstrate that it is not correct for several important world regions. The model now includes land intensification, and the resulting land use changes and emission values are lower as would be expected.ConclusionsDedicated energy crops are not similar to the first generation feedstocks in the sense that they do not generate the level of market-mediated responses which we have seen in the first-generation feedstocks. The major market-mediated responses are reduced consumption, crop switching, changes in trade, changes in intensification, and forest or pasture conversion. These largely do not apply to dedicated energy corps. The land use emissions for cellulosic feedstocks depend on what we assume in the emissions factor model regarding soil carbon gained or lost in converting land to these feedstocks. We examined this important point for producing bio-gasoline from miscanthus. Much of the literature suggests miscanthus actually sequesters carbon, if grown on the existing active cropland or degraded land. We provide some illustrative estimates for possible assumptions. Finally, it is important to note the importance of the new results for the regulatory process. The current California Air Resources Board carbon scores for corn ethanol and soy biodiesel are 19.8 and 29.1, respectively (done with a model version that includes irrigation). The new model and database carbon scores are 12 and 18, respectively, for corn ethanol and soy biodiesel. Thus, the current estimates values are substantially less than the values currently being used for regulatory purposes.

Effects of Ethanol Plant Proximity and Crop Prices on Land‐Use Change in the United States

Effects of Ethanol Plant Proximity and Crop Prices on Land‐Use Change in the United States

Land usage attributed to corn ethanol production in the United States: sensitivity to technological advances in corn grain yield, ethanol conversion, and co-product utilization

Farm Acreage Shocks and Crop Prices: An SVAR Approach to Understanding the Impacts of Biofuels

Role of land quality in corn acreage response to price and policy changes: evidence from the Western Corn Belt

Higher US crop prices trigger little area expansion so marginal land for biofuel crops is limited

Responsiveness of Crop Yield and Acreage to Prices and Climate

The Role of Cultivated Land Expansion on the Impacts to Global Agricultural Markets from Biofuels

Incorporating Sub‐National Brazilian Agricultural Production and Land‐Use into U.S. Biofuel Policy Evaluation

Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change

Identifying Supply and Demand Elasticities of Agricultural Commodities: Implications for the US Ethanol Mandate

Exploring the impacts of biofuel expansion on land use change and food security based on a land explicit CGE model: A case study of China

Understanding the evolution of environmental and energy performance of the US corn ethanol industry: evaluation of selected metrics

Climate Change Would Increase the Water Intensity of Irrigated Corn Ethanol

A review of domestic land use change attributable to U.S. biofuel policy

Reducing US Biofuels Requirements Mitigates Short-term Impacts of Global Population and Income Growth on Agricultural Environmental Outcomes

The time-varying dynamic impact of US renewable energy prices on agricultural prices in China: the case of fuel ethanol

Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types

The impact of considering land intensification and updated data on biofuels land use change and emissions estimates

Water Quality Effects of Economically Viable Land Use Change in the Mississippi River Basin under the Renewable Fuel Standard

Economic Assessment of Producing Corn and Cellulosic Ethanol Mandate on Agricultural Producers and Consumers in the United States