Assessing Marginal Land Availability Based on Land Use Change Information in the Contiguous United States

Chongya Jiang,Kaiyu Guan,Madhu Khanna,Luoye Chen,Jian Peng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02236

2021-07-23

Abstract:Utilization of marginal land for growing dedicated bioenergy crops for second-generation biofuels is appealing to avoid conflicts with food production. This study develops a novel framework to quantify marginal land for the Contiguous United States (CONUS) based on a history of satellite-observed land use change (LUC) over the 2008–2015 period. Frequent LUC between crop and noncrop is assumed to be an indicator of economically marginal land; this land is also likely to have a lower opportunity cost of conversion from food crop to bioenergy crop production. We first present an approach to identify cropland in transition using the time series of Cropland Data Layer (CDL) land cover product and determine the amount of land that can be considered marginal with a high degree of confidence vs with uncertainty across the CONUS. We find that the biophysical characteristics of this land and its productivity and environmental vulnerability vary across the land and lie in between that of permanent cropland and permanent natural vegetation/bare areas; this land also has relatively low intrinsic value and agricultural profit but a high financial burden and economic risk. We find that the total area of marginal land with confidence vs with uncertainty is 10.2 and 58.4 million hectares, respectively, and mainly located along the 100th meridian. Only a portion of this marginal land (1.4–2.2 million hectares with confidence and 14.8–19.4 million hectares with uncertainty) is in the rainfed region and not in crop production and, thus, suitable for producing energy crops without diverting land from food crops in 2016. These estimates are much smaller than the estimates obtained by previous studies, which consider all biophysically low-quality land to be marginal without considering economical marginality. The estimate of marginal land for bioenergy crops obtained in this study is an indicator of the availability of economically marginal land that is suitable for bioenergy crop production; whether this land is actually converted to bioenergy crops will depend on the market conditions. We note the inability to conduct field-level validation of cropland in transition and leave it to future advances in technology to ground-truth land use change and its relationship to economically marginal land.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c02236.Assessment of land vulnerability; temporal pattern of CDL cropland acreage agrees with reference dataset in 2008–2015 (Figure S1); CDL has larger year-to-year variation than MODIS land cover product during 2008–2015 (Figure S2); proportion of the 11 land use history types across the CONUS (Figure S3); county-level areas of CDL-derived fallowed cropland, expanded cropland, and abandoned cropland and reference datasets (Figure S4); land productivity and vulnerability derived from soil, terrain and climate data (Figure S5); definition of land cover types (Table S1); marginal land area using 0.4 ha (1 acre) patch constraint (Table S2); marginal land area using 0.4 ha (1 acre) patch constraint (Table S3) (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental