On some footnotes to Catharine Trotter Cockburn’s Defence of the Essay Of Human Understanding

Karen Green
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2018.1509202
2018-09-24
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Abstract:Two footnotes added to the version of Catharine Cockburn’s Defence of the Essay Of Human Understanding (1702) reprinted in her Works (1751) have led to various accusations, including that she was confused and an inadequate interpreter of Locke’s moral epistemology. In particular, it is claimed that she did not recognize the gulf that separated her own intellectualist and internalist views from Locke’s more voluntarist and hedonistic position. This paper defends Cockburn’s interpretation of Locke, arguing that the evidence for Locke being a voluntarist and hedonist is not compelling, and that Cockburn’s interpretation of his moral epistemology is well grounded in the Essay Of Human Understanding.
English Else
What problem does this paper attempt to address?