Life in Mind and Conduct: Studies of Organic in Human Nature

A. E. T.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/069102a0
IF: 64.8
1903-12-01
Nature
Abstract:READERS of Dr. Maudsley's former volumes will find in the present work both the faults and the merits of its predecessors. Dr. Maudsley here, as always, writes with a great deal of epigrammatic felicity, and shows from time to time vivid flashes of insight into human character; here, too, as formerly, he often mars the effect of his epigrams by a tendency to re-elaborate them into rhetorical “common-places,” in the technical sense of the term. The fundamental positions of the book may be reduced to three: the worlds of mind and of matter in reality form a single continuous evolution; “whatever is, is right,” being an inevitable result of the laws of that evolution; “private vices ” are, as Mandeville taught, “public benefits,” inas much as vice and virtue are alike expressions of the needs of the “social organism.” On this last topic Dr. Maudsley writes a great deal that is striking and not a little that is true, but he never explains how upon his principles the recognition of any distinction between right and wrong can be other than an absurdity. If the whole of morality is devotion to the advancement of society, and if, again, the advance ment of society is equally promoted by virtue and by crime (and this is what Dr. Maudsley more than once asserts), why should we make any distinction between the hero and the criminal? That God brings good out of evil is a truism; it does not follow that the evil is therefore as good as the good.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?