Impact of post-colposcopy management on women's long-term worries: results from the UK population-based TOMBOLA trial
Linda Sharp,Seonaidh Cotton,Margaret Cruickshank,Nicola Gray,Louise Smart,David Whynes,Julian Little,TOMBOLA Group,Maggie Cruickshank,Graeme Murray,David Parkin,Eric Walker,Norman Waugh,Mark Avis,Claire Chilvers,Katherine Fielding,Rob Hammond,David Jenkins,Jane Johnson,Keith Neal,Rashmi Seth,Dave Whynes,Ian Duncan,Alistair Robertson,Ian Russell,Leslie Walker,Breda Anthony,Sarah Bell,Adrienne Bowie,Katrina Brown,Joe Brown,Kheng Chew,Claire Cochran,Jeannie Dean,Kate Dunn,Jane Edwards,David Evans,Julie Fenty,Al Finlayson,Marie Gallagher,Maureen Heddle,Alison Innes,Debbie Jobson,Mandy Keillor,Jayne MacGregor,Sheona Mackenzie,Amanda Mackie,Gladys McPherson,Ike Okorocha,Morag Reilly,Joan Rodgers,Alison Thornton,Rachel Yeats,Lindyanne Alexander,Lindsey Buchanan,Susan Henderson,Tine Iterbeke,Susanneke Lucas,Gillian Manderson,Sheila Nicol,Gael Reid,Carol Robinson,Trish Sandilands,Marg Adrian,Ahmed Al-Sahab,Elaine Bentley,Hazel Brook,Claire Bushby,Rita Cannon,Brenda Cooper,Ruth Dowell,Mark Dunderdale,Dr Gabrawi,Li Guo,Lisa Heideman,Steve Jones,Salli Lawson,Zoë Philips,Christopher Platt,Shakuntala Prabhakaran,John Rippin,Rose Thompson,Elizabeth Williams,Claire Woolley,Kirsten Harrild,John Norrie,Nicholas Day,Theresa Marteau,Mahesh Parmar,Julietta Patnick,Ciaran Woodman,Doug Altman,Sue Moss,Michael Wells
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2015-101170
Abstract:Background: Effective cervical screening reduces cancer incidence and mortality. However, these benefits may be accompanied by some harms, potentially including, adverse psychological impacts. Studies suggest women may have concerns about various specific issues, such as cervical cancer. Aim: To compare worries about cervical cancer, future fertility, having sex, and general health between women managed by alternative policies at colposcopy. Design: Multicentre individually-randomised controlled trial, nested within the National Health Service Cervical Screening Programmes. Setting: UK. Methods: 1515 women, aged 20-59 years, with low-grade cytology who attended colposcopy during February 2001-October 2002, were randomised to immediate loop excision or punch biopsies with recall for treatment if cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2/3 was confirmed. Women completed questionnaires at recruitment and after 12, 18, 24 and 30 months. Outcomes were prevalence of worries at each time-point (point prevalence) and at any time-point during follow-up (12-30 months; cumulative prevalence). Primary analysis was by intention-to-treat (ITT); secondary per-protocol analysis compared groups according to management received among women with an abnormal transformation zone. Results: Cumulative prevalence of worries was: cervical cancer 40%; having sex 26%, future fertility 24%, and general health 60%. In ITT analyses, there were no statistically significant differences between management arms in cumulative or point prevalence of any of the worries. In per-protocol analyses, between-group differences were significant only for future fertility; cumulative prevalence was highest in women who underwent punch biopsies and treatment. Conclusions: There is no difference in the prevalence of specific worries in women randomised to alternative post-colposcopy management policies. Isrctn: 34841617.