Psychological impact of providing women with personalised 10-year breast cancer risk estimates

David P. French,Jake Southworth,Anthony Howell,Michelle Harvie,Paula Stavrinos,Donna Watterson,Sarah Sampson,D. Gareth Evans,Louise S. Donnelly
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0069-y
IF: 9.075
2018-05-08
British Journal of Cancer
Abstract:BackgroundThe Predicting Risk of Cancer at Screening (PROCAS) study estimated 10-year breast cancer risk for 53,596 women attending NHS Breast Screening Programme. The present study, nested within the PROCAS study, aimed to assess the psychological impact of receiving breast cancer risk estimates, based on: (a) the Tyrer–Cuzick (T-C) algorithm including breast density or (b) T-C including breast density plus single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), versus (c) comparison women awaiting results.MethodsA sample of 2138 women from the PROCAS study was stratified by testing groups: T-C only, T-C(+SNPs) and comparison women; and by 10-year risk estimates received: 'moderate' (5–7.99%), 'average' (2–4.99%) or 'below average' (<1.99%) risk. Postal questionnaires were returned by 765 (36%) women.ResultsOverall state anxiety and cancer worry were low, and similar for women in T-C only and T-C(+SNPs) groups. Women in both T-C only and T-C(+SNPs) groups showed lower-state anxiety but slightly higher cancer worry than comparison women awaiting results. Risk information had no consistent effects on intentions to change behaviour. Most women were satisfied with information provided. There was considerable variation in understanding.ConclusionsNo major harms of providing women with 10-year breast cancer risk estimates were detected. Research to establish the feasibility of risk-stratified breast screening is warranted.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?