White blood cell count in birds: evaluation of a commercially available method

Lea Carisch,Martina Stirn,Jean Michel Hatt,Karin Federer,Regina Hofmann-Lehmann,Barbara Riond
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1834-8
2019-03-14
BMC Veterinary Research
Abstract:<p>To conduct a hematological analysis of avian blood samples, standard automated cell counting is unreliable because all avian blood cells are nucleated. Therefore, quantitative white blood cell counting in birds is still performed manually, whereby the Natt-Herrick method is widely used in veterinary laboratories. The aim of this study was to evaluate a new commercially available single test system for avian white blood cell counting, the <em>Natt-Herricks-Tic®</em>, which would allow easy in-house analysis by clinicians or technicians. A total of 40 avian ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) blood samples from 24 different species were included in the study. To assess method agreement, each blood sample was analyzed for total white blood cell count with the test method and the Natt-Herrick reference method. To determine the imprecision of the reference method and the <em>Natt-Herricks-Tic®</em> method<em>,</em> the noncorrected white blood cell count was determined ten consecutive times from one avian EDTA blood sample for each method.The <em>Natt-Herricks-Tic®</em> method performed well concerning staining quality and countability of the granulocytes by the hemocytometer. In the agreement study, the <em>Natt-Herricks-Tic®</em> method showed a small proportional systematic error with a small positive mean bias of 282 white blood cells/μL but had wide 95% limits of agreement (− 4683 cells/μL to 5227 cells/μL), indicating random error. The precision study resulted in a coefficient of variation of 16% for the <em>Natt-Herricks-Tic®</em> method (the mean ± standard deviation: 9.7 ×  10<sup>3</sup>/μL ± 1.5 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL) and 23% (the mean ± standard deviation: 7.9 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL ± 1.8 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL) for the reference method.The <em>Natt-Herricks-Tic®</em> method showed acceptable precision for a manual method and demonstrated good agreement with the reference method. It can be recommended as a reliable and suitable method for determining white blood cell counts in avian EDTA blood if nonstatistical quality control measures are used in the daily routine. The application of individual reference intervals for the interpretation of white blood cell counts in birds may improve the diagnostic performance of this important analyte in a clinical setting.</p>
veterinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?